principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.3. Event Detection 57<br />
Ambuter <strong>and</strong> Solomon (1974) described a system using analog components<br />
for event detection logic <strong>and</strong> digital components for the delay-line<br />
memory <strong>and</strong> tape recording unit. Their cut<strong>of</strong>f criterion for recording was<br />
to stop recording 30 sec after the ratio <strong>of</strong> the short-term average to the<br />
long-term average, y(t), dropped below the threshold level Yd. They accomplished<br />
this by adding a feedback amplifier to the circuit that determined<br />
the long-term average. When an event was detected, the feedback<br />
amplifier was switched on <strong>and</strong> produced a slightly positive gain so that the<br />
long-term average would increase. Thus, y(t) eventually would drop<br />
below the threshold level, <strong>and</strong> the recorder would be turned <strong>of</strong>f 30 sec<br />
later.<br />
Eterno et al. (1974) suggested an alternative technique to cut <strong>of</strong>f the<br />
recording after an event was detected. A cut<strong>of</strong>f level yc can be defined by<br />
(3.5) Yc = Y(td + 1)<br />
where r (td + 1) is the value <strong>of</strong> y(r) at 1 sec after the event is detected at<br />
time td. The recording is terminated at some preset time after y(t) drops<br />
below the cut<strong>of</strong>f level yc. If y(t) drops below the detection threshold level<br />
Yd within 1 sec after the time t d, then the event is considered to be false<br />
<strong>and</strong> the detection is canceled.<br />
Johnson (1979) used a modification <strong>of</strong> the short-term <strong>and</strong> long-term<br />
averages technique (as described in Section 3.3.3) in an on-line detection<br />
<strong>and</strong> recording system for a large <strong>microearthquake</strong> network in southern<br />
California. The incoming analog seismic signals were digitized continuously,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the detected events were written on digital magnetic tapes for<br />
subsequent <strong>of</strong>f-line processing.<br />
Prothero (1979) has designed an ocean bottom seismograph system in<br />
which an event detector triggered a digital recording unit. The event detector<br />
was programmed in a microprocessor <strong>and</strong> could be changed readily<br />
if necessary.<br />
Other variations in methods <strong>of</strong> event detection <strong>and</strong> recording cut<strong>of</strong>f are<br />
possible. With rapid advances in microprocessor <strong>and</strong> related technology,<br />
these methods can become increasingly complex. Techniques for automatic<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> an event may become indistinguishable from those for<br />
automatic determination <strong>of</strong> the arrival times <strong>of</strong> an event.<br />
3.3.5. Automated Methods: Applications <strong>of</strong> Event Detectors for On-Line<br />
Data Processing<br />
On-line processing <strong>of</strong> the incoming signals from a <strong>microearthquake</strong><br />
network is required if real-time earthquake location is desired for earthquake<br />
prediction purposes. As discussed in the previous subsection, it