15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216 8. Applications for Earthquake Prediction<br />

tain seismic waves, seismic wave spectrum, focal depth, <strong>and</strong> orientation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the principal stress axes. The goal is to find some precursors that can<br />

discriminate between background earthquakes <strong>and</strong> foreshock activity. Although<br />

some earlier studies used data from regional <strong>networks</strong>, they have<br />

produced encouraging results <strong>and</strong> have suggested directions for more detailed<br />

investigations. Thus, a major reason to establish a <strong>microearthquake</strong><br />

network is to provide the necessary data for studying earthquake precursors.<br />

8.3.1. Changes in b-Slope<br />

As discussed in Section 1.1.2, the frequency <strong>of</strong> earthquakes as a function<br />

<strong>of</strong> magnitude may be represented by the Gutenberg-Richter relation<br />

(8.1) log N = - bM<br />

where N is the number <strong>of</strong> earthquakes <strong>of</strong> magnitude M or greater, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

<strong>and</strong> b are numerical constants. The parameter b is <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as<br />

b-slope, <strong>and</strong> it describes the rate <strong>of</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> earthquakes as magnitude<br />

decreases. Studies in many areas <strong>of</strong> the world have shown that the<br />

6-slope values usually are within the range <strong>of</strong> 0.6-1.2. This range corresponds<br />

to an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> earthquakes <strong>of</strong> 4 to 16 times for<br />

each decrease <strong>of</strong> magnitude by one unit.<br />

For a given sample <strong>of</strong> earthquake magnitude data, if we plot N versus<br />

M, then the 6-slope may be estimated from the slope <strong>of</strong> the least squares<br />

line fitted through the data points. Alternatively, the b-slope may be<br />

computed by Utsu’s formula (Utsu, 1965) in a form given by Aki (1965)<br />

(8.2) h = log(e)/(M - Mmin)<br />

where log(e) = 0.4343. &! is the average magnitude, <strong>and</strong> Mmin is the<br />

minimum magnitude in a given sample <strong>of</strong> data. Aki (1965) showed that Eq.<br />

(8.2) was the maximum likelihood estimate <strong>of</strong> the b-slope <strong>and</strong> derived<br />

confidence limits for this estimate. As pointed out by Hamilton (1967), Eq.<br />

(8.2) may be written as<br />

(8.3)<br />

Therefore, the nature <strong>of</strong> the frequency-magnitude relation is measured<br />

equivalently by b or &f (Wyss <strong>and</strong> Lee, 1973). Readers interested in a<br />

more detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> b-slope <strong>and</strong> its significance in earthquake<br />

statistics are referred to Utsu (1971). We now summarize a few examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> b-slope studies as they relate directly to earthquake prediction.<br />

Suyehiro et nl. (1964) calculated b-slopes from foreshock <strong>and</strong> aftershock<br />

activity associated with a magnitude 3.3 earthquake on January 22,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!