Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia
Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia
Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Books in Review<br />
High and Low<br />
Timothy Murray<br />
Like a Film: Ideological Fantasy on Screen,<br />
Camera and Canvas. Routledge, US$ 49-95/$i7.95<br />
John Gray<br />
Lost in North America: The Imaginary Canadian<br />
in the American Dream. Talonbooks, $17.95.<br />
Reviewed by Mark Harris<br />
If nothing else, the increasing marginalization<br />
<strong>of</strong> serious intellectual debate in North<br />
America has given rise to an interesting<br />
critical sub-genre diagnostically devoted to<br />
the reasons behind this worrisome decline.<br />
For Andrew Ross, Camille Paglia and the<br />
other interns <strong>of</strong> this postmodern cultural<br />
dis-ease, the widening gulf between journalistic<br />
and academic writing is perhaps<br />
the worst and least necessary <strong>of</strong> "No-Brain"<br />
culture's aggravating factors. Things were<br />
better, they assert, when arguments were<br />
lucid and cogent rather than abstruse and<br />
citation-choked. Freelance urban intellectuals<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Irving Howe variety are<br />
favourably compared, in such polemics, to<br />
the inward-looking eggheads and mindless<br />
popularizers who have arisen in their wake,<br />
while the New York magazine culture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
1940s and '50s is fondly remembered as a<br />
vanished Golden Age <strong>of</strong> almost Athenian<br />
splendour.<br />
While it is easy to make fun <strong>of</strong> some<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> these critiques—particularly<br />
their anti-theoretical slant, which <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
contain a thinly-veiled "No Nothing" suspicion<br />
<strong>of</strong> those wily foreigners, the<br />
French—the greater part <strong>of</strong> their complaints<br />
are not only valid but—pace, poststructuralists!—true.<br />
Nowadays, few<br />
general interest magazines soar above the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> People, while academic journals are<br />
typically as narrowly-focussed and hermetic<br />
as a plumber's newsletter.<br />
Big Capital couldn't have organized<br />
things better if it had tried—which, to a<br />
certain extent, it did. Even so, the greater<br />
share <strong>of</strong> the blame clearly belongs to those<br />
<strong>of</strong> us on either side <strong>of</strong> the populist fence<br />
who allowed culture to be polarized out <strong>of</strong><br />
any viable relationship with quotidian reality.<br />
What's lacking on both sides is passion,<br />
the natural desire to impart something significant<br />
to a second party and thereby make<br />
a difference, a feeling as alien to most literary<br />
academics as it is to the paid corps <strong>of</strong><br />
publishers' flacks. Consequently, most <strong>of</strong><br />
the cultural criticism being written in<br />
English today reflects this woeful lack.<br />
If not for this Manichean split, it would<br />
be impossible to discuss the latest books by<br />
Timothy Murray and John Gray in the<br />
same review. Although both authors are<br />
concerned with contemporary culture, they<br />
are basically writing for entirely different<br />
audiences. Murray's Like a Film: Ideological<br />
Fantasy on Screen, Camera and Canvas is<br />
aimed at an exclusively academic readership,<br />
while Gray's Lost in North America:<br />
The Imaginary Canadian in the American<br />
Dream reads like a 200 page Op Ed piece<br />
published in a middle-<strong>of</strong>-the-road<br />
Canadian newspaper. The first shudders at<br />
the very thought <strong>of</strong> slipping into easy readability,<br />
while the second cheerfully absolves<br />
the peruser <strong>of</strong> any need to acquire prior<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> the world.<br />
Although its eight chapters are all composed<br />
by the same person, Like a Film<br />
unfolds like a series <strong>of</strong> essays by different<br />
scholars on related topics. In his introduction,<br />
Murray informs us that he wishes to<br />
reflect "on the broad impact <strong>of</strong> the cinematic<br />
apparatus on interdisciplinary experimentations<br />
in the arts... on social and<br />
political narratives... on representational<br />
and visual theory... on perceptions and<br />
articulations <strong>of</strong> history.. . and, ultimately,<br />
on the subsequent return <strong>of</strong> the procedures<br />
and results <strong>of</strong> interdisciplinary experimentation<br />
itself to the cinema and its language."<br />
Describing himself as a critic who is<br />
"sensitive to [his] own subject position as a<br />
heterosexual, white male," Murray then<br />
160