15.11.2014 Views

Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia

Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia

Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Books in Review<br />

High and Low<br />

Timothy Murray<br />

Like a Film: Ideological Fantasy on Screen,<br />

Camera and Canvas. Routledge, US$ 49-95/$i7.95<br />

John Gray<br />

Lost in North America: The Imaginary Canadian<br />

in the American Dream. Talonbooks, $17.95.<br />

Reviewed by Mark Harris<br />

If nothing else, the increasing marginalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> serious intellectual debate in North<br />

America has given rise to an interesting<br />

critical sub-genre diagnostically devoted to<br />

the reasons behind this worrisome decline.<br />

For Andrew Ross, Camille Paglia and the<br />

other interns <strong>of</strong> this postmodern cultural<br />

dis-ease, the widening gulf between journalistic<br />

and academic writing is perhaps<br />

the worst and least necessary <strong>of</strong> "No-Brain"<br />

culture's aggravating factors. Things were<br />

better, they assert, when arguments were<br />

lucid and cogent rather than abstruse and<br />

citation-choked. Freelance urban intellectuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Irving Howe variety are<br />

favourably compared, in such polemics, to<br />

the inward-looking eggheads and mindless<br />

popularizers who have arisen in their wake,<br />

while the New York magazine culture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1940s and '50s is fondly remembered as a<br />

vanished Golden Age <strong>of</strong> almost Athenian<br />

splendour.<br />

While it is easy to make fun <strong>of</strong> some<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> these critiques—particularly<br />

their anti-theoretical slant, which <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

contain a thinly-veiled "No Nothing" suspicion<br />

<strong>of</strong> those wily foreigners, the<br />

French—the greater part <strong>of</strong> their complaints<br />

are not only valid but—pace, poststructuralists!—true.<br />

Nowadays, few<br />

general interest magazines soar above the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> People, while academic journals are<br />

typically as narrowly-focussed and hermetic<br />

as a plumber's newsletter.<br />

Big Capital couldn't have organized<br />

things better if it had tried—which, to a<br />

certain extent, it did. Even so, the greater<br />

share <strong>of</strong> the blame clearly belongs to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> us on either side <strong>of</strong> the populist fence<br />

who allowed culture to be polarized out <strong>of</strong><br />

any viable relationship with quotidian reality.<br />

What's lacking on both sides is passion,<br />

the natural desire to impart something significant<br />

to a second party and thereby make<br />

a difference, a feeling as alien to most literary<br />

academics as it is to the paid corps <strong>of</strong><br />

publishers' flacks. Consequently, most <strong>of</strong><br />

the cultural criticism being written in<br />

English today reflects this woeful lack.<br />

If not for this Manichean split, it would<br />

be impossible to discuss the latest books by<br />

Timothy Murray and John Gray in the<br />

same review. Although both authors are<br />

concerned with contemporary culture, they<br />

are basically writing for entirely different<br />

audiences. Murray's Like a Film: Ideological<br />

Fantasy on Screen, Camera and Canvas is<br />

aimed at an exclusively academic readership,<br />

while Gray's Lost in North America:<br />

The Imaginary Canadian in the American<br />

Dream reads like a 200 page Op Ed piece<br />

published in a middle-<strong>of</strong>-the-road<br />

Canadian newspaper. The first shudders at<br />

the very thought <strong>of</strong> slipping into easy readability,<br />

while the second cheerfully absolves<br />

the peruser <strong>of</strong> any need to acquire prior<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the world.<br />

Although its eight chapters are all composed<br />

by the same person, Like a Film<br />

unfolds like a series <strong>of</strong> essays by different<br />

scholars on related topics. In his introduction,<br />

Murray informs us that he wishes to<br />

reflect "on the broad impact <strong>of</strong> the cinematic<br />

apparatus on interdisciplinary experimentations<br />

in the arts... on social and<br />

political narratives... on representational<br />

and visual theory... on perceptions and<br />

articulations <strong>of</strong> history.. . and, ultimately,<br />

on the subsequent return <strong>of</strong> the procedures<br />

and results <strong>of</strong> interdisciplinary experimentation<br />

itself to the cinema and its language."<br />

Describing himself as a critic who is<br />

"sensitive to [his] own subject position as a<br />

heterosexual, white male," Murray then<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!