15.11.2014 Views

Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia

Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia

Jean Rivard - University of British Columbia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

several <strong>of</strong> these arguments for non-violence also surface in Aleta Dey. As the<br />

war years grind on, Aleta becomes increasingly disturbed by the reactions <strong>of</strong><br />

her fellow countrywomen/men to war. She identifies their wartime ideologies<br />

as unimaginative, selfish, and bloodthirsty; she is horrified by their open<br />

declarations <strong>of</strong> hatred for the German people, appalled that they prefer to<br />

conscript men over wealth, angered that they fail to recognize the prevalence<br />

<strong>of</strong> both propaganda and war pr<strong>of</strong>iteering, and discouraged that pre-war suffragists<br />

and pacifists have suddenly turned litigious (207-13). It is not Aleta's<br />

abhorrence <strong>of</strong> these vengeful positions, however, which brings her the courage<br />

to voice her views, but the government's suppression <strong>of</strong> her right to speak<br />

against them which catapults her into "action." As she says, "I might have<br />

muddled along to the end had not the government begun to forbid us to<br />

discuss the war at all, except favourably" (216). Her telephone tapped, warned<br />

by the government censor not to oppose conscription, Aleta finds her<br />

"courage." Defiant, she takes to the streets, distributing pamphlets demanding<br />

that freedom <strong>of</strong> speech and <strong>of</strong> the press be preserved (217). This act <strong>of</strong><br />

resistance challenges the dominant culture, and Aleta is thrown into jail.<br />

While incarcerated, she continues to wrestle with her cowardice. Although<br />

she cannot be certain that her pacifist views are infallible, she comes to the<br />

decision that she must "serve" humanity in the only way she knows; she<br />

must denounce violence publicly, and speak her pacifist opinions forthrightly<br />

(222). Uppermost is her belief that it is wrong to silence any voices.<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the novel, Aleta foregoes meeting her beloved McNair, a soldier<br />

returning from combat, in order to make a public address against the<br />

war. Knowing she runs the risk <strong>of</strong> being jailed again, she willingly takes it,<br />

for "the whole point <strong>of</strong> the meeting is that it is to be addressed by one who<br />

has been in jail and who refuses to be silenced" (227). Her "fearless" deed<br />

proves her undoing, however, for her behaviour poses serious threats to the<br />

wielders <strong>of</strong> oppressive power. While exercising her freedom to speak, a soldier<br />

who is going overseas to fight for freedom (and to protect women),<br />

knocks Aleta <strong>of</strong>f the public podium, and the blow eventually kills her.<br />

Hundreds <strong>of</strong> people with pacifist leanings, too "cowardly" to declare themselves<br />

openly, throng to Aleta's funeral. Here, Beynon uses her text didactically<br />

to address those who did not go along with the government's wartime<br />

injunctions, but who either lacked the courage to speak their peace, or on<br />

other grounds were reluctant to voice their objections. Joan Byles sets out<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the reasons many women had for remaining silent:<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!