16.11.2014 Views

McGraw-Hill

McGraw-Hill

McGraw-Hill

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

292 Expandingoppo~ties<br />

F I G U R E 11-1<br />

Impact of Divergence of Opinion and Restricted Shorting on<br />

Market Equilibrium<br />

uniform<br />

Investor Opinion<br />

DiVerSe<br />

Market Portfolio<br />

Efficient<br />

CAPMandAIJT<br />

Hold<br />

(No One Shorts)<br />

Market Portfolio<br />

Efficient<br />

CAPMandApT<br />

Hold<br />

Market Portfolio<br />

Market Portfolio<br />

maent Not Efficient<br />

CAPMandAFT<br />

CAPMandAIT<br />

Hold<br />

Do Not Hold<br />

l<br />

I<br />

this last case, because investor opinion is indeed diverse and shortsellin<br />

is restricted.<br />

tdward Miller (1987 and 1990) examines the impact of divergence<br />

of opinion and restricted shorting on security prices. He<br />

shows that restricted shorting leads to security overvaluation,<br />

because each stock's price is bid up by optimistic investors, while<br />

pessimists have difficulty shorting. As a consequence of this overvaluation,<br />

a shortfall arises between the returns anticipated by the<br />

optimistic investors and what they subsequently receive.<br />

Further, a stock's overvaluation is greater, the more the divergence<br />

of opinion about it, because the most optimistic investors are<br />

even more extreme in their expectations. Hence, the wider the dispersion<br />

of opinion about a stock, the greater the overvaluation and<br />

eventual disappointment. An empirical measure of the divergence<br />

of opinion about stock's a prospects is the dispersion of security analysts'<br />

earnings estimates, often referred to as "earnings controversy."<br />

Jacobs and Levy (1988b) find that companies with higher<br />

earnings controversy experience lower subsequent returns, consistent<br />

with Miller's hypothesis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!