16.11.2014 Views

McGraw-Hill

McGraw-Hill

McGraw-Hill

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308 Expanding Opportunities<br />

FIGURE 11-9<br />

Risk-Return Comparisons-Long-Short Strategies versus<br />

Benchmarks-June 1990-December 1992<br />

20 -<br />

quitized<br />

15 -<br />

10 -<br />

5 - T-Ba<br />

I<br />

O o 2 4 k 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

Risk (Ann- Standard Deviation)<br />

Nde:Un,hedgere(umsmnwnena,lW91.<br />

500. The equitized strategy added roughly the same value versus th<br />

W 500 as the market-neutral strategy did versus Treasury bills. The<br />

stock index futures overlay transported the longshort spread to the<br />

stock market. The equitized strategy had about the same risk as the<br />

S&P 500. The hedge strategy, in terms of risk and reward, was between<br />

the market-neutral and equitized strategies.<br />

The market-neutral strategy has an absolute return objective,<br />

because its returns are not correlated with those of the stock market.<br />

It has about half the volatility of the market and is obviously riskier<br />

than cash. We categorize market-neutral as an "alternative equity.<br />

The equitized strategy has a relative return objective, because<br />

its returns are highly correlated with those of the stock market.<br />

While it has about the same volatility as the market, its tracking error<br />

will generally be higher than that of traditional long strategies.<br />

We categorize equitized as "flexible equity," because it allows m<br />

flexible portfolio management than traditional long investing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!