1oz61wa
1oz61wa
1oz61wa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Legislative History (COICA, PIPA and SOPA)<br />
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) announced his opposition to taking up the bill in the Senate, and, to<br />
date has successfully stalled Senate action.<br />
On July 22, 2011, Sen. Leahy filed the Senate Judiciary Committee’s written report on the PRO-<br />
TECT IP Act. S. Rep. No. 112-39 (2011).<br />
Following several months of inactivity on the bill due to Senator Wyden’s hold, Senator Harry Reid<br />
(D-NV) introduced a “cloture” motion on December 17, 2011 to “bring to a close” the debate on<br />
the motion to allow the PROTECT IP Act to be considered on the floor of the Senate. According to<br />
the Congressional Record, the cloture vote was originally scheduled for January 24, 2012, beginning<br />
at 2:15 pm. 3<br />
Immediately after the cloture motion was filed, Senator Wyden again expressed his intent to<br />
filibuster the bill. 4 On January 12, 2012, Senator Leahy offered to withdraw a provision in the<br />
PROTECT IP Act that was criticized for its impact on Domain Name System (“DNS”) security. 5 On<br />
January 20, 2012, Senator Leahy issued a public statement about the postponing of the vote on the<br />
cloture. 6 A new date has not yet been set.<br />
In the meantime, Senator Wyden introduced his own version of an anti-counterfeiting/ anti-piracy<br />
bill in the Senate on December 17, 2011, 7 entitled “Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital<br />
Trade Act” (the “OPEN Act”), S. 2029, 112th Cong. (2011). The bill was co-sponsored by Sen.<br />
Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS). The Senate bill has been referred to the<br />
Senate Finance Committee.<br />
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) introduced a companion bill, H.B. 3782, on January 18, 2012. 8 Twentyfive<br />
co-sponsors have been identified to date. 9 The House bill has been referred to both the House<br />
Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on the Judiciary.<br />
On a related note, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee scheduled a hearing<br />
on January 18, 2012 entitled “Government Mandated DNS Blocking and Search Takedowns—<br />
Will It End the Internet as We Know It?” The hearing has been postponed and a new date has not<br />
yet been set.<br />
B. House Action: Stop Online Piracy Act (H.R. 3261)<br />
The House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Intellectual Property,<br />
Competition and the Internet has held two hearings on the topic of enforcing U.S. trademark and<br />
copyright rights against illegitimate web sites. The first was held on March 14, 2011 entitled<br />
“Promoting Investment and Protecting Commerce Online: Legitimate Sites v. Parasites, Part I.”<br />
Testimony was presented by Maria A. Pallante (Acting Register of Copyrights, U.S. Copyright<br />
Office), David Sohn (Senior Policy Counsel, Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT)), Daniel<br />
Castro (Senior Analyst, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF)) and Frederick<br />
Huntsberry (Chief Operating Officer, Paramount Pictures).<br />
The Committee held a second hearing on April 6, 2011. Testimony was presented at this time by<br />
Hon. John Morton (Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement); Floyd Abrams (a<br />
First Amendment litigation specialist who testified on his own behalf); Kent Walker (Senior Vice<br />
President and General Counsel for Google); and Christine Jones (Executive Vice President and<br />
General Counsel for the GoDaddy Group).<br />
On October 26, 2011, several members of the House Judiciary Committee, including Chairman<br />
Lamar Smith (R-TX), and ranking Democrat John Conyers (D-MI) introduced the Stop Online<br />
Piracy Act (“SOPA”) (H.R. 3261), a companion bill to S. 968, but with some significant differences<br />
95