1oz61wa
1oz61wa
1oz61wa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Government Remedies<br />
71. Id. §337A(e)(4) .<br />
72. Id. §337A(c)(3).<br />
73. Rep. Ron Wyden, “Statement for the Record, U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Hearing ‘Targeting<br />
Websites Dedicated To Stealing American Intellectual Property’” (Feb. 16, 2011) (available at http://<br />
www.wyden.senate.gov/priorities/fighting-for-digital-rights).<br />
74. Law Professors, Letter in Opposition to COICA (undated) (available at https://www.eff.org/files/<br />
filenode/coica_files/Professors’%20Letter%20re%20COICA%20and%20Signatories.pdf); Peter Eckersley, “An<br />
Open Letter from Internet Engineers to the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Electronic Frontier Foundation (Sept.<br />
28, 2010) (available at https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/09/open-letter); “Statement of the Center for<br />
Democracy & Technology Regarding the Hearing: Targeting Websites Dedicated to Stealing American Intellectual<br />
Property,” Center for Democracy & Technology (Feb. 16, 2011) (available at https://www.cdt.org/files/pdfs/<br />
20110216_rogue_sites_statement.pdf).<br />
75. Some of the rebuttal came from Internet engineering experts who thought the concerns were<br />
wrongheaded, misleading or overblown. See, e.g., George Ou, “My DNS Filtering Research before House<br />
SOPA Panel” (Dec. 16, 2011) (available at http://www.hightechforum.org/my-dns-filtering-research-beforehouse-sopa-panel/);<br />
George Ou, “DNS Filtering is Essential to the Operation of the Internet” (June 24, 2011)<br />
(available at http://www.hightechforum.org/dns-filtering-is-essential-to-the-internet/).<br />
76. Statement of Michael O’Leary, Senior Executive Vice President for Global Policy and External Affairs at<br />
the MPAA, “Open Act Ineffective in Targeting Growing Threat of Foreign Criminal Websites,” Press Release<br />
(Jan. 11, 2012) (available at http://www.mpaa.org/resources/428712e0-704e-4f00-b2ab-2e5c59b35a82.pdf).<br />
77. Library Copyright Alliance et al., Letter to Sen. Wyden, Rep. Issa, and Rep. Chaffetz (Dec. 12, 2011)<br />
(available at http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/lca_letteropenact_12dec11.pdf).<br />
78. Joint Letter to Rep. Issa and Rep. Chaffetz (undated), signed by AOL, eBay, Facebook, Google,<br />
LinkedIn, Mozilla, Twitter, Yahoo!, Zynga (available at http://keepthewebopen.com/assets/pdfs/12-13-<br />
11%20Big%20Web%20Companies%20OPEN%20Endorsement%20Letter.pdf).<br />
79. Susan Decker, “Kodak Loses Case Against Apple, RIM on Imaging Patent,” Bloomberg (July 20, 2012)<br />
(available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-20/kodak-loses-case-against-apple-rim-on-imagingpatent.html);<br />
see also Jamie Keene, “RIAA call online piracy a threat to national security,” The Verge (Jan. 6,<br />
2012) (available at http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/6/2686593/riaa-rejects-open-confirms-sopa-support); Chloe<br />
Albanesius, “Amidst SOPA, PIPA Blackouts, Issa Introduces Rival OPEN Act,” PCMag.com (Jan. 18, 2012)<br />
(available at http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2399070,00.asp); Sandra Aistars, “The Alternative is<br />
Impractical,” New York Times (Jan. 18, 2012) (available at http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/01/18/<br />
whats-the-best-way-to-protect-against-online-piracy/the-open-act-is-impractical-for-artists).<br />
80. Eric Goldman, “The OPEN Act: Significantly Flawed But More Salvageable Than SOPA/PROTECT-<br />
IP” (Dec. 10, 2011) (available at http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/12/the_open_act_de.htm).<br />
81. Id.<br />
82. Id.; see also Colleen V. Chien, “Patently Protectionist? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Cases at the<br />
International Trade Commission,” 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. at. 63 (2008) (available at http://papers.ssrn.com/<br />
sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1150962).<br />
83. Eric Goldman, “The OPEN Act: Significantly Flawed But More Salvageable Than SOPA/PROTECT-<br />
IP” (Dec. 10, 2011) (available at http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/12/the_open_act_de.htm).<br />
84. Id.; see also Colleen V. Chien, “Patently Protectionist? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Cases at the<br />
International Trade Commission,” 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. at. 63 (2008) (available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/<br />
papers.cfm?abstract_id=1150962).<br />
65