1oz61wa

Appendix
49. Art Brodsky, “Public Knowledge Sees Dangers In New Intellectual Property Bill,” Public Knowledge
Blog (Oct. 26, 2011) (available at http://www.publicknowledge.org/news-blog/blogs/public-knowledge-seesdangers-new-intellectual-pro).
50. Sherwin Siy, “House Version of Rogue Websites Bill Adds DMCA Bypass, Penalties for DNS
Workarounds,” Public Knowledge Blog (Oct. 26, 2011) (commenting on the original version of SOPA introduced
in October 2011) (available at http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/house-version-rogue-websites-billadds-dmca-b).
51. Compare Nicole Kardell, “Protests Mount Against Proposed Law That Would Cripple the Internet,
Crime in the Suites” (Jan. 3, 2012) (available at http://crimeinthesuites.com/tag/first-amendment/) (claiming that
search engines bear overwhelming burden from imposition of SOPA and its “facilitation” liability provision);
with Charlie Osborne, “Google’s SOPA press stunt: Can we truly hold them liable?,” ZD-Net iGeneration (Dec.
30, 2011) (available at http://www.zdnet.com/blog/igeneration/googles-sopa-press-stunt-can-we-truly-holdthem-liable/13971).
52. Trevor Timm, “Proposed Copyright Bill Threatens Whistleblowing and Human Rights,” EFF Deeplinks
Blog (Nov. 2, 2011) (available at https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/proposed-copyright-bill-threatenswhistleblowing-and-human-rights.)
53. Id.
54. On January 18, 2012, Representative Issa introduced an identically titled bill in the House, joined by
twenty-five co-sponsors.
55. Current statistics show 2 Senators supporting the Senate version (S. 2029) and 25 Representatives cosponsoring
the House version (H.R. 3287), in addition to their initial sponsors.
56. Gautham Nagesh, “Twitter, Facebook, Google endorse alternate online piracy bill” (Jan. 5, 2012)
(available at http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/202627-twitter-facebook-and-google-endorsealternate-online-piracy-bill).
Others have identified AOL, eBay, Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, Mozilla, twitter,
Yahoo!, Zynga, the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), Computer and Communications Industry
Association (CCIA) and netcoalition.com as supporters of the bill. See Press Release, “Rep. Mike Thompson
Releases Statement Against SOPA, In Support of OPEN Act” (Jan. 18, 2012) (available at http://
mikethompson.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=275323).
57. See, e.g., Sen. Wyden “The Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade (OPEN) Act,” (available
at http://wyden.senate.gov/issues/issue/?id=e881b316-5218-4bcd-80a1-9112347fe2f4); Press Release, “Issa
Introduces the OPEN Act” (Jan. 18, 2012) (available at http://issa.house.gov/
index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=949&Itemid=28&Itemid=4).
58. Statement of Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) at 398 (Dec. 15, 2011) (“I would note that the bill that you have
authored [the OPEN Act] actually has some due process tests so that you cut off the money, but at least you
know that there is an opportunity to be heard even on an expedited basis.”) (available at http://
judiciary.house.gov/_files/hearings/pdf/transcript12152011.pdf).
59. See, e.g. Spansion, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 629 F.3d 1331, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (holding that the
requirement for obtaining an exclusion order at ITC is less stringent than the requirement for obtaining an
injunction in a U.S. district court after a trial for patent infringement).
60. See, e.g., 19 C.F.R. § 201.16(f) (2014) (existing rule providing for electronic service in ITC proceedings).
61. See e.g., Eric Goldman, “The OPEN Act: significantly flawed, but more salvageable than SOPA/
PROTECT-IP,” ars technica Law & Disorder Blog (Dec. 2011) (available at http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/
news/2011/12/the-open-act-significantly-flawed-but-more-salvageable-than-sopaprotect-ip.ars).
62. Amanda Reynolds, “Mythbusting at CES,” Copyright Alliance Blog (Jan. 10, 2012) (available at http://
blog.copyrightalliance.org/2012/01/mythbusting-at-ces/).
63. OPEN Act, § 337A(e)(4) (2012) (“If the President disapproves of a determination of the Commission
for policy reasons and notifies the Commission of that disapproval, the determination and any order issued
pursuant to the determination shall cease to have force or effect on the date on which the President notifies the
Commission of that disapproval.”); Sandra Aistars, “OPEN Act Falls Short for Artists and Creators,” Copyright
Alliance Blog (Dec. 14, 2011) (available at http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2011/12/open-act-falls-short-forartists-and-creators/).
64. See, e.g., In re Convertible Exerciser Patent Litig., 721 F. Supp. 596 (D. Del. 1989), reh’d denied (Fed.
Cir. 1990); see Lannon Mfg. Co., Inc. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 799 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1989).
112