1oz61wa
1oz61wa
1oz61wa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Legislative History (COICA, PIPA and SOPA)<br />
65. 19 C.F.R. § 210.75 (2014) (“Prior to effecting any modification, revocation, or exclusion under this<br />
section, the Commission shall consider the effect of such action upon the public health and welfare, competitive<br />
conditions in the U.S. economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and<br />
U.S. consumers.”).<br />
66. Senator Wyden explained, “The OPEN Act takes a much narrower and more targeted approach to<br />
combating online infringement than other proposed legislation by targeting only sites “primarily and willfully”<br />
engaging in infringement” (available at http://wyden.senate.gov/issues/issue/?id=e881b316-5218-4bcd-80a1-<br />
9112347fe2f4).<br />
67. As Chairman Smith explained, “The Wyden-Issa bill [the OPEN Act] narrows the definition of an illegal<br />
infringing site to such an extreme that it will be virtually meaningless and nearly impossible to prove.” Press<br />
Release, “OPEN Act Increases Bureaucracy, Won’t Stop IP Theft” (Jan. 19, 2012) (available at http://<br />
judiciary.house.gov/news/01192012.html?scp=2&sq=lamar%20smith&st=cse).<br />
68. Mitch Glazier, “A Case For Closing OPEN: ITC, 33 Months Later... ,” RIAA’s Music Notes Blog (Jan.<br />
4, 2012) (available at http://riaa.com/blog.php?content_selector=riaa-news-blog&content_selector=riaa-newsblog&blog_selector=Case-For-Closing-OPEN-&news_month_filter=1&news_year_filter=2012)<br />
(“Why in the<br />
world would we shift enforcement against these sites from the Department of Justice and others who are wellversed<br />
in these issues to the ITC, which focuses on patents and clearly does not operate on the short time frame<br />
necessary to be effective? In addition, the remedy traditionally offered by the ITC—an exclusion order to prevent<br />
foreign criminals from accessing the US market—is precluded under the OPEN Act.”); Eric Engleman & Susan<br />
Decker , “Fighting Movie Piracy Seen Likely to Swamp U.S. Trade Agency,” Bloomberg News (Dec. 7, 2011)<br />
(available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-07/fighting-movie-piracy-seen-likely-to-swamp-u-strade-agency.html);<br />
Holly Lance, “Not So Technical: An Analysis of Federal Circuit Patent Decisions Appealed<br />
from the ITC,” 17 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 243 (2010) (available at http://www.mttlr.org/volseventeen/<br />
lance.pdf) (“The ITC almost exclusively addresses patent infringement violations, possibly because trademark<br />
and copyright holders are able to register their intellectual property with Customs and Border Protections and<br />
therefore may not have as much use for the protections of the ITC.”).<br />
69. ITC, The Year in Trade 2010, Operation of the Trade Agreements Program, Pub. 4247 at xvii (July<br />
2011) (available at http://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4247.pdf).<br />
70. MPAA Press Release, “OPEN Act Ineffective in Targeting Growing Threat of Foreign Criminal<br />
Websites” (Jan. 11, 2012) (available at http://www.mpaa.org/resources/428712e0-704e-4f00-b2ab-<br />
2e5c59b35a82.pdf) (“It creates a time consuming and costly method for copyright holders to adjudicate against<br />
foreign thieves. Instead of using the federal courts that already decide copyright infringement cases, it adds<br />
additional hurdles for independent artists and small businesses. The bill does not contain technical means to<br />
block foreign websites from the American market and it allows companies profiting from online piracy to<br />
advocate for foreign rogue websites against rightful American copyright holders. Finally, the legislation will lead<br />
to a costly expansion of bureaucracy.”).<br />
71. Patent litigators Steven Carlson and Alexander Harguth (Fish & Richardson, P.C.) wrote in a presentation<br />
about proceedings in the ITC, “Budget will be similar to district court litigation, except that fees and costs<br />
will be compressed into one year, instead of spread out over several years.” (available at http://www.fr.com/files/<br />
uploads/attachments/munich/2-CarlsonAndHarguth-ITC.pdf).<br />
72. Tim Smith & Katherine A. Franco, “Patent Enforcement at the International Trade Commission: Is It<br />
Worth It?,” Renewable Energy World, Feb. 18, 2011 (previously available at http://<br />
www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/02/patent-issues-patent-enforcement-at-the-internationaltrade-commission-is-it-worth-it).<br />
113