1oz61wa

Chapter 2
167. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-cv-24049, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142630, at *9 (S.D. Fla.
Dec. 12, 2011) (preliminary injunction).
168. Deckers Outdoor Corp v. Doe, No. 11 C 10, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119448, at *15-*19 (ND. Ill. Oct
14, 2011) (default judgment).
169. Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 9-10 (S.D.N.Y., April 30, 2012) (default
judgment and permanent injunction).
170. PayPal, “Buyer Protection, Seller Protection” (available at https://cms.paypal.com/cgi-bin/
marketingweb?cmd=_render-content&content_ID=security/online_security_center).
171. Visa, “Security Program,” (available at http://usa.visa.com/personal/security/visa_security_program/
index.html) (relating to fraud provention and identity theft protection).
172. MasterCard, “Fraud Prevention: Arming You with Knowledge” (available at http://www.mastercard.us/
merchants/security/fraud-prevention.html).
173. Letter from American Express Company et al. to Sen. Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Comm. on
the Judiciary (May 25, 2011) (available at http://cdt.org/files/NC-Letter_on_PRA_on_Protect_IP_Act-4.pdf).
174. Testimony of Denise Yee, Senior Trademark Counsel, Visa, Inc. before the Senate Judiciary Committee,
S. Hr’g 112-47 at 15 (Feb. 16, 2011) (available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg67443/pdf/
CHRG-112shrg67443.pdf) (“And the essential part of the legislation—and I agree with my colleagues here, with
Verizon and Go Daddy—is the safe harbor and to make sure that we are not penalized for trying to do the right
thing.”); see also Testimony of Thomas M. Dailey, Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, Verizon, , S.
Hr’g 112-47 at 15 (Feb. 16, 2011) (available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg67443/pdf/
CHRG-112shrg67443.pdf) (“Immunity from liability is very important because we do not want to be dealing
with lawsuits that might follow from some of the activity that could be required under the law.”).
175. Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 9 (S.D.N.Y., April 30, 2012) (default
judgment and permanent injunction).; True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 9 (S.D.N.Y. Dec
2, 2011) (preliminary injunction).
176. “ORDERED that, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. §1116(a) and this Court’s inherent equitable power to
issue provisional remedies ancillary to its authority to provide final equitable relief, any third party providing
services in connection with any Defendant and/or Defendants’ websites, including without limitation ISPs, backend
service providers, affiliate program providers, web designers, and sponsored search engine or ad-word
providers, shall immediately temporarily disable service to any and all Defendants’ Infringing Web Sites. . . “
True Religion, No. 11-cv-8242 at 15.
177. See Enigmax, “Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, ISPS, All Served with Streaming Site Blocking Demand,:
Torrent Freak (Dec. 1, 2011) (available at https://torrentfreak.com/google-microsoft-yahoo-isps-all-served-withstreaming-site-blocking-demand-111201/).
178. See n. 56. Each of SOPA and PIPA permitted a governmental entity—the Department of Justice—to
seek de-indexing by search engines of websites found by a U.S. District Court to be foreign rogue sites. But
neither bill allowed private plaintiffs to seek such relief.
179. See, e.g., Sean Carlos, “6 methods to control what and how your content appears in search engines,”
Antezeta (Feb. 18, 2007) (available at http://antezeta.com/news/avoid-search-engine-indexing).
180. See, e.g., Ariele McWhinney, “SOPA, PIPA and Search Engine Marketing,” Marketing Mojo (Jan. 19,
2012) (available at http://blog.search-mojo.com/sopa-pipa-search-engine-marketing/).
181. Testimony of Katherine Oyama, Copyright Counsel, Google, Inc., before the House of Rep. Committee
on the Judiciary (Nov. 16, 2011) (available at http://judiciary.house.gov/_files/hearings/pdf/
Oyama%2011162011.pdf).
182. Chanel, Inc. v. Eukuk.com, et al., No 2:11-CV-01508-KJD-PAL, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38481, at 12
(D. Nev. March 20, 2012) (sixth temporary restraining order).
183. True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 14, 15 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2011) (temporary
restraining order).
184. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-cv-24049, at 5 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2011) (temporary
restraining order).
185. Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 9 (S.D.N.Y., March 6, 2012) (temporary
restraining order).
186. Marshall Brain & Stephanie Crawford, “How Domain Name Servers Work,” HowStuffWorks.com
(available at http://www.howstuffworks.com/dns.htm; accessed July 13, 2012).
187. Id.
44