1oz61wa

Recommendations

Info

Civil Remedies at *10-*11, *24-*25 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2012) (recommending award of statutory damages, costs and attorneys’ fees). 154. See Henry (Litong) Chen, “The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in China,” Bloomberg L. Rep. (2009) (available at http://www.mwe.com/info/pubs/BLR_1109.pdf). 155. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, “More than $896,000 in proceeds seized from the online sale of counterfeit sports apparel manufactured in China,” Press Release (Apr. 10, 2012) (available at http:// www.ice.gov/news/releases/1204/120410washingtondc.htm) (“Pursuant to warrants issued by a U.S. district judge, law enforcement officers seized $826,883 in proceeds that had been transferred from PayPal accounts to various bank accounts in China.”). 156. 17 U.S.C. §504. 157. 15 U.S.C. §1117(c). 158. See, e.g., Lanham Act §34(d)(5)(B), 15 U.S.C. §1116(d)(5)(B); Coach, Inc. v. Brightside Boutique, Cause No. 1:11-CA-20 LY, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1464 at *10-*11, *24-*25 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2012) (recommending award of statutory damages, costs and attorneys’ fees); compare with Reebok v. McLaughlin, 49 F.3d 1387 (9th Cir. 1995) (seizure rejected for foreign-based assets). 159. “[B]ut it can be difficult to litigate against uncooperative foreign entities and/or to enforce a judgment abroad.” Written Statement of Maria A. Pallante, Acting Register of Copyrights before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet, House Committee on the Judiciary (Mar. 14, 2011) (available at http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031411.html). 160. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, “More than $896,000 in proceeds seized from the online sale of counterfeit sports apparel manufactured in China,” Press Release (Apr. 10, 2012) (available at http:// www.ice.gov/news/releases/1204/120410washingtondc.htm) (“The individuals conducted sales and processed payments for the counterfeit goods using PayPal accounts and then wired their proceeds to bank accounts held at Chinese banks. Pursuant to warrants issued by a U.S. district judge, law enforcement officers seized $826,883 in proceeds that had been transferred from PayPal accounts to various bank accounts in China. The funds were seized from correspondent, or interbank, accounts held by the Chinese banks in the United States. Pursuant to additional seizure warrants issued by a U.S. magistrate judge, law enforcement officers also seized $69,504 in funds remaining in three PayPal accounts used by the subjects.”). 161. True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 10 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2011) (temporary restraining order). 162. See Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 6-7 (S.D.N.Y. April 30, 2012) (default judgment and permanent injunction). 163. See Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623 (S.D.N.Y., April 30, 2012) (default judgment and permanent injunction) (financial providers, advertisers, search engines, DNS registrars, website hosts, ISPs, shippers and carriers); Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-cv-24049, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142630 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 12, 2011) (preliminary injunction) (financial providers, DNS registrars); True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec 2, 2011) (preliminary injunction) (financial providers, advertisers, search engines, DNS registrars, ISPs); Chanel, Inc. v. Eukuk.com, et al., No 2:11-CV-01508-KJD- PAL, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38481 (D. Nev. March 20, 2012) (sixth temporary restraining order) (DNS registrars, search engines); Deckers Outdoor Corp v. Doe, No. 11 C 10, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119448 (N.D. Ill. Oct 14, 2011) (default judgment) (financial providers, DNS registrars). 164. See Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 9 (S.D.N.Y., March 6, 2012) (temporary restraining order); Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-cv-24049, at 5 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2011) (temporary restraining order); True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 15 (S.D.N.Y. Nov 18, 2011) (temporary restraining order); all of which featured a TRO against trademark counterfeiting websites. 165. Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 10 (S.D.N.Y., April 30, 2012) (default judgment and permanent injunction) (“Further, upon giving actual notice of such an Order to any search engines … such Internet Search … Websites shall de-index and remove from any search results pages.”); Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-cv-24049, at 8 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2011) (temporary restraining order) (“Upon receipt of this Order, Western Union … shall divert all money transfers”); True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 14 (S.D.N.Y. Nov 18, 2011) (temporary restraining order) (“VeriSign, Inc., Neustar, Inc., and Public Interest Registry … within three days of receipt of this Order, temporarily disable these domain names”). 166. True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 10 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2011) (temporary restraining order). 43
Chapter 2 167. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-cv-24049, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142630, at *9 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 12, 2011) (preliminary injunction). 168. Deckers Outdoor Corp v. Doe, No. 11 C 10, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119448, at *15-*19 (ND. Ill. Oct 14, 2011) (default judgment). 169. Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 9-10 (S.D.N.Y., April 30, 2012) (default judgment and permanent injunction). 170. PayPal, “Buyer Protection, Seller Protection” (available at https://cms.paypal.com/cgi-bin/ marketingweb?cmd=_render-content&content_ID=security/online_security_center). 171. Visa, “Security Program,” (available at http://usa.visa.com/personal/security/visa_security_program/ index.html) (relating to fraud provention and identity theft protection). 172. MasterCard, “Fraud Prevention: Arming You with Knowledge” (available at http://www.mastercard.us/ merchants/security/fraud-prevention.html). 173. Letter from American Express Company et al. to Sen. Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary (May 25, 2011) (available at http://cdt.org/files/NC-Letter_on_PRA_on_Protect_IP_Act-4.pdf). 174. Testimony of Denise Yee, Senior Trademark Counsel, Visa, Inc. before the Senate Judiciary Committee, S. Hr’g 112-47 at 15 (Feb. 16, 2011) (available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg67443/pdf/ CHRG-112shrg67443.pdf) (“And the essential part of the legislation—and I agree with my colleagues here, with Verizon and Go Daddy—is the safe harbor and to make sure that we are not penalized for trying to do the right thing.”); see also Testimony of Thomas M. Dailey, Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, Verizon, , S. Hr’g 112-47 at 15 (Feb. 16, 2011) (available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg67443/pdf/ CHRG-112shrg67443.pdf) (“Immunity from liability is very important because we do not want to be dealing with lawsuits that might follow from some of the activity that could be required under the law.”). 175. Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 9 (S.D.N.Y., April 30, 2012) (default judgment and permanent injunction).; True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 9 (S.D.N.Y. Dec 2, 2011) (preliminary injunction). 176. “ORDERED that, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. §1116(a) and this Court’s inherent equitable power to issue provisional remedies ancillary to its authority to provide final equitable relief, any third party providing services in connection with any Defendant and/or Defendants’ websites, including without limitation ISPs, backend service providers, affiliate program providers, web designers, and sponsored search engine or ad-word providers, shall immediately temporarily disable service to any and all Defendants’ Infringing Web Sites. . . “ True Religion, No. 11-cv-8242 at 15. 177. See Enigmax, “Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, ISPS, All Served with Streaming Site Blocking Demand,: Torrent Freak (Dec. 1, 2011) (available at https://torrentfreak.com/google-microsoft-yahoo-isps-all-served-withstreaming-site-blocking-demand-111201/). 178. See n. 56. Each of SOPA and PIPA permitted a governmental entity—the Department of Justice—to seek de-indexing by search engines of websites found by a U.S. District Court to be foreign rogue sites. But neither bill allowed private plaintiffs to seek such relief. 179. See, e.g., Sean Carlos, “6 methods to control what and how your content appears in search engines,” Antezeta (Feb. 18, 2007) (available at http://antezeta.com/news/avoid-search-engine-indexing). 180. See, e.g., Ariele McWhinney, “SOPA, PIPA and Search Engine Marketing,” Marketing Mojo (Jan. 19, 2012) (available at http://blog.search-mojo.com/sopa-pipa-search-engine-marketing/). 181. Testimony of Katherine Oyama, Copyright Counsel, Google, Inc., before the House of Rep. Committee on the Judiciary (Nov. 16, 2011) (available at http://judiciary.house.gov/_files/hearings/pdf/ Oyama%2011162011.pdf). 182. Chanel, Inc. v. Eukuk.com, et al., No 2:11-CV-01508-KJD-PAL, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38481, at 12 (D. Nev. March 20, 2012) (sixth temporary restraining order). 183. True Religion v. Xiaokang Lei, No. 11-cv-8242 (HB), at 14, 15 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2011) (temporary restraining order). 184. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-cv-24049, at 5 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2011) (temporary restraining order). 185. Hermès Int’l et al. v. John Doe et al., No. 12 Civ. 1623, at 9 (S.D.N.Y., March 6, 2012) (temporary restraining order). 186. Marshall Brain & Stephanie Crawford, “How Domain Name Servers Work,” HowStuffWorks.com (available at http://www.howstuffworks.com/dns.htm; accessed July 13, 2012). 187. Id. 44
Page 1 and 2:
A Section White Paper: A Call for A
Page 3 and 4:
The views expressed herein represen
Page 5 and 6:
Call for Action for Online Piracy a
Page 7 and 8:
Call for Action for Online Piracy a
Page 10 and 11: INTRODUCTION: BALANCING THE INTERES
Page 12 and 13: Introduction found in national laws
Page 14 and 15: Introduction There are also many si
Page 16: Introduction 12. “Medicines: spur
Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1 adjudication of extra-ter
Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1 law and the broadest pote
Page 24 and 25: Chapter 2 CIVIL REMEDIES I. SECTION
Page 26 and 27: Civil Remedies By way of further cl
Page 28 and 29: Civil Remedies ad revenue, payment
Page 30 and 31: Civil Remedies Whether the Predator
Page 32 and 33: Civil Remedies Knowledge. The “kn
Page 34 and 35: Civil Remedies ISPs and web hosting
Page 36 and 37: Civil Remedies . . . . However, thi
Page 38 and 39: Civil Remedies trademark owner, Tif
Page 40 and 41: Civil Remedies Finally, the alterna
Page 42 and 43: Civil Remedies Legislative revision
Page 44 and 45: Civil Remedies Most intermediaries
Page 46 and 47: Civil Remedies of foreign sites who
Page 48 and 49: Civil Remedies the RIAA initiated l
Page 50 and 51: Civil Remedies employ DNSSEC, which
Page 52 and 53: Civil Remedies 25. See BAE Systems
Page 54 and 55: Civil Remedies 121, 134-35 (2d Cir.
Page 56 and 57: Civil Remedies 84. Id. at 1169. 85.
Page 58 and 59: Civil Remedies 124. Id. at 5. 125.
Page 62 and 63: Civil Remedies 188. A technical ove
Page 64 and 65: Chapter 3 PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIO
Page 66 and 67: Private Enforcement Actions labeled
Page 68: Private Enforcement Actions interme
Page 71 and 72: Chapter 4 the Civil Remedies chapte
Page 73 and 74: Chapter 4 These complaints, while b
Page 75 and 76: Chapter 4 The Act would not have es
Page 77 and 78: Chapter 4 Evoking by far the most i
Page 79 and 80: Chapter 4 States Interests at Home
Page 81 and 82: Chapter 4 47. Combating Online Infr
Page 84 and 85: Chapter 5 VOLUNTARY ACTION I. SECTI
Page 86 and 87: Voluntary Action it timely responde
Page 88 and 89: Voluntary Action Content owners may
Page 90 and 91: Voluntary Action various ISPs and m
Page 92 and 93: Voluntary Action Partnerships, such
Page 94 and 95: Voluntary Action (1) Google Play Fo
Page 96 and 97: Voluntary Action Other registrars,
Page 98 and 99: Voluntary Action Notes 1. Preventin
Page 100 and 101: Voluntary Action websites. eBay rec
Page 102 and 103: Voluntary Action 80. See “What is
Page 104 and 105: Voluntary Action 116. See “Report
Page 106 and 107: Chapter 6 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS Th
Page 108: Summary of Conclusions • Encourag
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix summaries provided below o
Page 113 and 114:
Appendix from the Senate bill. In m
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix It appears that this bill
Page 117 and 118:
Appendix b) Statements in Oppositio
Page 119 and 120:
Appendix 4. Miscellaneous Provision
Page 121 and 122:
Appendix As of December 15, 2011, a
Page 123 and 124:
Appendix 106 C. Online Protection a
Page 125 and 126:
Appendix • Finally, costs to proc
Page 127 and 128:
Appendix plenty-criticism); see als
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix 49. Art Brodsky, “Public
Page 132:
About the ABA Section of Intellectu
show all

1oz61wa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?