18.11.2014 Views

1oz61wa

1oz61wa

1oz61wa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4<br />

GOVERNMENT REMEDIES<br />

I. SECTION POSITION<br />

The IPL Section favors legislation authorizing the U.S. Government to conduct investigations and<br />

institute criminal and civil enforcement proceedings against Predatory Foreign Websites. The<br />

Section also supports legislation granting the U.S. Government the authority to seek issuance of<br />

court orders enjoining intermediaries from conducting transactions with Predatory Foreign<br />

Websites.<br />

II.<br />

SECTION RESOLUTION: TF-08<br />

RESOLVED, the IPL Section supports providing for legislation enabling the U.S. Government to<br />

prosecute criminally and/or undertake civil enforcement of copyright piracy and trademark<br />

counterfeiting initiated by Predatory Foreign Websites as defined by resolution TF-06 and directed<br />

to U.S. end-users/customers.<br />

NOW THEREFORE, the IPL Section supports the enactment of legislation authorizing the U.S.<br />

Government to undertake both criminal and civil investigations and enforcement activities against<br />

Predatory Foreign Websites, and to seek the issuance of court orders enjoining intermediaries from<br />

conducting business with such websites.<br />

III.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

A. Background<br />

One of the challenges posed by extra-territorial Internet piracy is maximizing resources available<br />

to enforce intellectual property rights against non-U.S.-based infringing websites. In today’s global<br />

and increasingly ideas-based economy, the enforcement of intellectual property rights is no longer<br />

simply the cost of doing business, but a national economic concern costing the United States<br />

billions of dollars each year. 1 Moreover, the proliferation of Internet shopping combined with the<br />

high profit margins and perceived low risk from selling infringing goods, has resulted in more<br />

prevalent, more sophisticated, and more dangerous counterfeit and pirated goods. 2 Efforts to<br />

combat infringement therefore demand a national solution that brings to bear both public and<br />

private resources.<br />

The IPL Section examines the federal government’s current role in efforts to combat online counterfeiting<br />

and piracy, as well as recent legislative proposals that have sought to expand the<br />

government’s ability to police infringements emanating from beyond U.S. jurisdictional bounds. It<br />

explores how balancing a public right of action with a private right of action would best maximize<br />

resources available in the combat against extra-territorial online piracy and counterfeiting. This<br />

section focuses solely on efforts concerning websites that are based outside of the United States<br />

and dedicated to activities that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights.<br />

There is no uniform term to describe foreign websites that engage in online piracy and counterfeiting.<br />

For the sake of brevity, this paper will use the term “Predatory Foreign Websites” defined in<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!