18.11.2014 Views

1oz61wa

1oz61wa

1oz61wa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<br />

from doing that search. Under §512(m), nothing in the applicable section of the DMCA shall be<br />

construed to require YouTube’s “affirmatively seeking facts indicating infringing activity.” 31<br />

Finally, the court explained that the “mere knowledge of the prevalence of infringing activity, and<br />

welcoming it, does not itself forfeit the safe harbor. To forfeit that, the provider must influence or<br />

participate in the infringement.” 32<br />

Accordingly, while recent decisions have discussed the applicability of certain exceptions to the<br />

DMCA’s safe harbor provisions to specific fact patterns, the divergence of opinions among various<br />

courts considering digital copyright enforcement cases suggests that the “correct” application of<br />

the DMCA is far from obvious. While intermediaries can generally avoid liability by providing<br />

mechanisms through which copyright owners can report alleged instances of copyright infringement,<br />

and by subsequently taking steps to remove such content where appropriate, 33 many copyright<br />

pirates have found ways to utilize the safe harbor provisions as loopholes and online<br />

infringement continues largely unfettered. Although the current legal structure creates a powerful<br />

incentive for intermediaries to cooperate voluntarily, the primary enforcement burden still falls on<br />

the copyright owner, who must constantly patrol the Internet for infringements. Unfortunately,<br />

rightsholders often find that, without further cooperative measures from ISPs such as takedownstaydown<br />

policies or content filtering, the same copyrighted titles continue to be infringed on the<br />

same sites over and over again.<br />

Moreover, recent proposals made by Maria Pallante, the Register of Copyrights, during a speech at<br />

Columbia University 34 and later during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee. Subcommittee<br />

on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, 35 suggest that a major overhaul of the<br />

Copyright Act may be warranted in light of the dramatically evolved Internet environment through<br />

which many works now travel. Indeed, Rep. Goodlatte (R-VA) has taken up the challenge and<br />

announced on April 24, 2013, that the House Judiciary Committee has launched a comprehensive<br />

review of copyright law to determine whether it adequately protects copyrights in “the digital<br />

age,” 36 particularly in light of online distribution, breakdowns in licensing payments due to<br />

rampant unauthorized online distribution, orphan works, statutory licensing and damages. 37 As a<br />

result, the DMCA’s current structure and/or mandates may evolve over the next several years as<br />

lawmakers attempt to bring the entire Copyright Act up to date with respect to digital works.<br />

70<br />

2. DMCA Requirements vs. Recent Voluntary Initiatives in the Copyright Field<br />

While the DMCA provides incentives for ISPs and other such parties to voluntarily implement<br />

notice and removal procedures for online copyright infringement, it does not by itself represent a<br />

voluntary industry initiative. Instead, it is a statutory mandate which ISPs must follow if they wish<br />

to take advantage of the safe harbors from liability for monetary damages provided under the Act.<br />

However, the methods by which some intermediaries have implemented this mandate are helpful in<br />

understanding the choices intermediaries have made (or can make) of purely voluntary actions to<br />

reduce counterfeiting and piracy undertaken on their systems. Questions remain regarding the<br />

scope and effectiveness of truly voluntary industry initiatives that have been implemented to date.<br />

To the extent that certain strategies have proven to be effective, they can potentially serve as key<br />

components of a more comprehensive and uniform legislative plan for combating the continued<br />

reach of PFWs into the U.S. market.<br />

An example of an independent voluntary initiative that has been successfully implemented is<br />

YouTube’s Content ID program. 38 This program allows copyright owners to easily identify and<br />

manage their content on YouTube and provides them with streamlined mechanisms for preventing<br />

or otherwise expediently removing copyright infringing content online. 39 Videos uploaded to<br />

YouTube are scanned against a database of files that have been submitted by content owners. 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!