City of Greater Sudbury Transportation Study Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3. Give higher priority to roads with higher classification, and with heavier traffic volumes. 4. Maintain roads that are predominantly used by trucks at a higher standard. Road Improvements 5. Initiate the following within the next five years: a. Environmental Assessment Studies (update previous EA studies) for the following: i. Maley Drive extension and widening. ii. iii. iv. Alternate Access to Laurentian University and South Shore of Ramsey Lake. MR 15 widening. MR 35 widening. v. LaSalle Boulevard widening. vi. vii. The Kingsway widenings. MR 80 widening. b. Construction of the Maley Drive extension and widening. c. Construction of the New University Link. d. Construction of the MR 15 widening. e. Construction of the MR 35 widening. f. Construction of the LaSalle Boulevard widening. g. Construction of the Kingsway widenings. h. Construction of the MR 80 widening. i. Conversion of the existing left turn through lanes on Paris Street and Long Lake Road to left turn lanes and the construction of additional through lanes on Paris Street and Long Lake Road at the Four Corners. j. Construction of a northbound right turn channelization at the Paris Street/Ramsey Lake Road intersection. k. Construction of dual eastbound, westbound and southbound left turn lanes and additional northbound and southbound through lanes at the LaSalle Boulevard/Notre Dame Avenue intersection. CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY OFFICIAL PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT September 2005 Page E4
l. Construction of one additional westbound and one additional northbound left turn lanes at the LaSalle Boulevard/Barrydowne Road intersection as well as one additional northbound through lane. m. Construction of southbound left turn lane improvements and a right turn lane at the LaSalle Boulevard/Falconbridge Highway intersection. 6. Continue to monitor traffic growth and service levels along MR 80. A future Class EA study of the widening of MR 80 should consider the Barrydowne Road extension and the potential by-pass of the McCrea Heights area as viable alternatives. At the time of this future study, updated growth forecasts should be prepared for Valley East, based on observed growth trends and known development activity or planning applications in the area. The Class EA study should reconfirm the need and justification for the improvements and include a detailed evaluation of social, cultural, and environmental impacts, which was beyond the scope of this Transportation Study, to confirm the recommended planning alternative. Greater Sudbury should ensure that any planning applications received in this area do not preclude the option of the Barrydowne Road extension, until such time as a future Class EA and route planning study can be completed. 7. Initiate the remaining road improvements identified in Chapter 11 after the above shortterm improvements have been implemented. 8. Undertake detailed feasibility / operational studies for the following localized improvements that may be required to address area growth or other localized operational deficiencies: a. The Hawthorne Drive Connection between Notre Dame Avenue and Barrydowne Road and the Montrose Avenue Extension southerly to the Hawthorne Drive Connection. b. Operational improvements and the westerly extension of Ste. Anne Road under the railway tracks to Pine Street/College Street. c. The extension of Treeview Gateway Drive from Long Lake Road to Regent Street. 9. Recognize and protect for the following long-term road improvement needs that may be required beyond the planning horizon. a. The widening of Falconbridge Highway from Garson-Coniston Road to Radar Road. b. The construction of the Northeast Bypass from Maley Drive to Highway 17. c. The extension of LaSalle Boulevard easterly to the future Northeast Bypass. d. The widening of MR 55 from Highway 17 to Big Nickel Mine Drive. e. Improvement of the Frood Road/Regent Street corridor to create an alternative northsouth arterial route. CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY OFFICIAL PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT September 2005 Page E5
Page 1 and 2: City of Greater Sudbury Transportat
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED 4. TRAF
Page 5 and 6: FIGURES CONTINUED Figure 8.1.1 Road
Page 7 and 8: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Context The City
Page 9: A second series of public informati
Page 13 and 14: 18. Continue to require the prepara
Page 15 and 16: Data Collection and Monitoring 43.
Page 17 and 18: Levack Onaping Dowling Worthington
Page 19 and 20: Schedule C Projects generally inclu
Page 21 and 22: 1.5. Scope of Work The scope of wor
Page 23 and 24: A second series of public informati
Page 25 and 26: Chapter 11 - IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Wi
Page 27 and 28: The former City of Sudbury makes up
Page 29 and 30: Truck Routes Wahnapitae First Natio
Page 31 and 32: Existing Daily Traffic Volumes (200
Page 33 and 34: 2.3.2. Screenlines The operation of
Page 35 and 36: Ramsey Lake Road in the westbound d
Page 37 and 38: Based on findings of the household
Page 39 and 40: Conventional Transit Routes Capreol
Page 41 and 42: To address these issues, Greater Su
Page 43 and 44: The following list of accessibility
Page 45 and 46: The results to these questions are
Page 47 and 48: 2.9.2. Chamber of Commerce The Grea
Page 49 and 50: 3. HOUSEHOLD SURVEY 3.1. Methodolog
Page 51 and 52: A comparison of trip purpose betwee
Page 53 and 54: 4. TRAFFIC FORECASTING MODEL 4.1. M
Page 55 and 56: Figure 4.2.1 - Traffic Zone System
Page 57 and 58: Table 4.3.1 - Assumed Auto Capaciti
Page 59 and 60: Figure 4.4.1 - P.M. Peak Period Hom
Page 61 and 62:
Rio Can Centre Super Mall New Sudbu
Page 63 and 64:
The goodness of fit for these FIGUR
Page 65 and 66:
Table 4.6.1 - Model Validation Scre
Page 67 and 68:
5. FUTURE CONDITIONS To generate fu
Page 69 and 70:
Daily Travel Demand City of Greater
Page 71 and 72:
Table 5.5.1 - Screenline Analysis -
Page 73 and 74:
Year 2021 Capacity Deficiencies Cit
Page 75 and 76:
Building Blocks For A Comprehensive
Page 77 and 78:
7. EVALUATION OF ROAD NETWORK IMPRO
Page 79 and 80:
Table 7.3.1 - Example of Comparativ
Page 81 and 82:
The use of Barrydowne Road as an al
Page 83 and 84:
A truck bypass is required for a nu
Page 85 and 86:
The Barrydowne Road extension alter
Page 87 and 88:
Road Improvements Common to All Alt
Page 89 and 90:
8.2. Evaluation of the Road Network
Page 91 and 92:
Table 8.2.1 - Road Network Improvem
Page 93 and 94:
In terms of the economic environmen
Page 95 and 96:
8.3. Potential Road Improvements Be
Page 97 and 98:
9. LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 9.1. Loc
Page 99 and 100:
4. Kathleen Street Improvements Kat
Page 101 and 102:
for Bancroft Drive, minimal traffic
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 9.1.2 - Montrose Road Extens
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 9.1.4 - Martilla Drive Exten
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 9.1.6 - Barrydowne South Con
Page 109 and 110:
Provide dual northbound left turn l
Page 111 and 112:
10. ROAD DESIGNATIONS 10.1. Existin
Page 113 and 114:
TABLE 10.1.1 - ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Page 115 and 116:
Under future conditions, the sectio
Page 117 and 118:
10.3. Road Access Policies Policies
Page 119 and 120:
Greater Sudbury staff should encour
Page 121 and 122:
Widen MR 80. Provide a continuous l
Page 123 and 124:
11.3. Funding Options Capital outla
Page 125 and 126:
12. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations
Page 127 and 128:
a. The Hawthorne Drive Connection b
Page 129 and 130:
25. Continue to improve coverage th
show all

City of Greater Sudbury Transportation Study Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?