City of Greater Sudbury Transportation Study Report
City of Greater Sudbury Transportation Study Report
City of Greater Sudbury Transportation Study Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8. ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS<br />
Possible solutions that will address existing and future capacity deficiencies were determined<br />
through the review <strong>of</strong> findings contained within earlier studies, examination <strong>of</strong> right-<strong>of</strong>-way<br />
widths, site visits and discussions with <strong>City</strong> staff. Solutions took the form <strong>of</strong> new roads, road<br />
widenings, or operational improvements such as the addition <strong>of</strong> turning lanes, or traffic signal<br />
optimization.<br />
In this chapter, improvements that benefit the road network, as a whole, are discussed.<br />
Road improvements that demonstrate a localized benefit to the immediate neighborhood or<br />
adjacent intersection and primarily service trips in the local area are discussed in Chapter 9.<br />
The following list identifies the corridors that are either experiencing p.m. peak hour capacity<br />
problems now or will experience capacity problems by 2021.<br />
1. Notre Dame Avenue between Elm Street and LaSalle Boulevard.<br />
2. The Kingsway between Lloyd Street and 3 rd Avenue.<br />
3. LaSalle Boulevard between Barrydowne Road and MR 35.<br />
4. MR 55 between Big Nickel Mine Drive and Highway 17, and the Southwest Bypass<br />
between Long Lake Road and MR 55.<br />
5. MR 35 between Azilda and Chelmsford.<br />
6. Ramsey Lake Road between South Bay Road and Paris Street.<br />
7. MR 80 (Notre Dame Avenue) from north <strong>of</strong> LaSalle Boulevard to MR 15 (Main Street) in<br />
Valley East. This includes the section <strong>of</strong> MR 80 through McCrea Heights.<br />
For each <strong>of</strong> the corridors experiencing problems, alternative improvements were identified<br />
and screened. In some cases, the screening process concluded that there was only one<br />
viable alternative to address the problem. In other cases, the screening process concluded<br />
that there was more than one viable alternative to address the problem. These alternatives<br />
were then carried forward for further evaluation.<br />
1. Notre Dame Avenue in the northbound direction between Elm Street and LaSalle<br />
Boulevard<br />
Notre Dame Avenue, in the northbound direction, between Elm Street and LaSalle<br />
Boulevard is nearing capacity during the p.m. peak hour and expected to reach capacity<br />
by 2021. Possible solutions to mitigate this deficiency include widening the existing road,<br />
widening an alternate parallel road, or constructing a new road.<br />
Due to existing physical constraints in the east and the built up nature <strong>of</strong> the area to the<br />
west, it was concluded that constructing a new road parallel to Notre Dame Avenue is not<br />
a feasible alternative.<br />
CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY<br />
OFFICIAL PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT<br />
September 2005 Page 65