City of Greater Sudbury Transportation Study Report

Table 2.3.2 - Screenline Analysis - Existing Road Network
SCREENLINE
NUMBER
SCREENLINE NAME
AUTOS
INBOUND TRAFFIC
CAPACITY
VOLUME TO
CAPACITY RATIO
1 South Entrance 1024 2500 0.41
2 West Entrance 2054 7700 0.27
3 LaSalle North 2195 10100 0.22
4 LaSalle South 2832 6700 0.42
5 Lively-Azilda to Sudbury 1522 7700 0.20
6 External South East 775 2900 0.27
7 Valley East-Sudbury 1089 4300 0.25
8 Hanmer North-South 681 3400 0.20
9 Rayside-Balfour 925 1800 0.51
10 East Entrance 865 3400 0.25
11 External West 715 5400 0.13
12 Barrydowne 2682 4000 0.67
SCREENLINE
NUMBER
OUTBOUND TRAFFIC
SCREENLINE NAME AUTOS CAPACITY
VOLUME TO
CAPACITY RATIO
1 South Entrance 645 2500 0.26
2 West Entrance 2911 7700 0.39
3 LaSalle North 3276 10100 0.32
4 LaSalle South 4235 6700 0.64
5 Lively-Azilda to Sudbury 2187 7700 0.28
6 External South East 1203 2900 0.41
7 Valley East-Sudbury 2061 4300 0.48
8 Hanmer North-South 1280 3400 0.38
9 Rayside-Balfour 1275 1800 0.71
10 East Entrance 1054 3400 0.31
11 External West 775 5400 0.14
12 Barrydowne 3014 4000 0.75
2.4. Existing Road Capacity Deficiencies
Although no problems were identified at the screenline level, analysis of the model results
(p.m. peak hour) for individual corridors revealed several areas where capacity deficiencies
currently exist. Problematic road links include:
The Kingsway between Lloyd Street and Barrydowne Road in both directions.
The Kingsway between Falconbridge Highway and 3 rd Avenue in the eastbound direction.
LaSalle Boulevard in the westbound direction between Barrydowne Road and MR 35.
MR 35 in the westbound direction between Azilda and Chelmsford.
CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY
OFFICIAL PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT
September 2005 Page 19