Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
130 Mean squared displacement<br />
cumene fall closer to the much less fragile glycerol than it does to m-toluidine, which<br />
has fragility similar to that of cumene.<br />
As an alternative figure 7.9 shows the absolute values of mean square displacement<br />
for the five liquids in one plot. The temperature is again scaled to T g , but the 〈u 2 〉’s<br />
are given in absolute units of Å 2 . This plot is the same type of plot as the ones<br />
presented in figure 4 and figure 5 of [Ngai, 2004]. It is this type of plot which is used<br />
to argue that the absolute values of 〈u 2 〉 at T g are larger for liquids with larger n<br />
(smaller β KWW larger fragility in the frame of Ngai’s coupling model). In figure 7.9<br />
we see that least fragile liquid, glycerol does indeed have the lowest absolute value.<br />
However, the extremely fragile DHIQ falls just between the liquids with much lower<br />
fragility, at odds with the results reported by Ngai [2004].<br />
[A 2 ]<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
DHIQ<br />
cumene<br />
m−Toluidine<br />
DBP<br />
Glycerol<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2<br />
T/T g<br />
Figure 7.9: 〈u 2 〉 as a function of temperature for 5 different liquids. The temperature<br />
is scaled to T g .<br />
7.4.1 Pressure dependence<br />
The value of 〈u 2 〉/a 2 at T g does not appear to be universal, when considering the<br />
5 liquids studied here. This breakdown of the Lindemann criterion can be ad hoc<br />
explained by allowing C in equation 7.3.1 to be material dependent. The Lindemann<br />
prediction becomes weaker, but can still be scrutinized by looking at the pressure<br />
dependent T g of a given system. The “pressure dependent” Lindemann criterion<br />
following from equation 7.3.1 says that 〈u 2 〉/a 2 should be constant on an isochrone,<br />
particularly T g (P) (This is a special case of equation 3.4.2). The change in density<br />
will lead to a change in 〈u 2 〉 but also to a change in a 2 . The simplest assumption for<br />
the density dependence is to assume that it follows the change in density; a ∝ ρ −1/3<br />
[Dyre, 2006].<br />
Figure 7.10 shows the temperature dependence of the mean square displacement in