23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 Experimental techniques and observables<br />

probe used. Thermal neutrons and X-ray in the keV range both have Q-vectors<br />

of the order of magnitude 1 Å −1 such that 1/Q is comparable to the characteristic<br />

distances between nearest neighbors in condensed matter. Both probes are therefore<br />

well suited for studying structure in matter unlike for example visible light, which<br />

probes Q values that are 3 orders of magnitude smaller.<br />

The energy loss of the probe is of course limited by the energy of the probe itself,<br />

the neutron can not loose more energy than it has. There is moreover for a given<br />

Q-value an additional limitation because the transfer of energy and momentum are<br />

interdependent. This is the so called kinematic limitation. It is anticipated from<br />

inserting the relation between energy and momentum in equation 4.3.3. This relation<br />

is not the same for neutrons and photons. For neutrons we have<br />

while the relation for photons is<br />

E neutron = 2 Q 2 neutron<br />

2m neutron<br />

(4.3.13)<br />

E photon = c Q photon , (4.3.14)<br />

where c is the speed of light. The difference between the expressions above lead to<br />

different kinematic limitations, even if there are kinematic limitations in both cases.<br />

However, kinematic limitation does not have any practical importance for inelastic<br />

X-ray scattering because the energy transfers of interest when studying dynamics<br />

on an intermolecular scale is of the order of magnitude meV while the energy of the<br />

X-ray is in the keV range. Inelastic X-ray scattering has therefore given access to a<br />

domain in energy-Q-space which where not accessible by neutrons.<br />

The transfer of energy in a real experiment is always given by a certain resolution.<br />

The resolution function is the actual measured signal in a situation where an ideal<br />

experiment would have given a delta function. The measured signal is therefore in<br />

general given by a convolution of the ideal signal and the resolution function. The<br />

shape and width of the resolution is in most cases determined empirically. It depends<br />

on the scattering geometry, the characteristics of the beam (monochromation and<br />

collimation) and on how precisely the change in energy can be measured. The total<br />

energy of thermal neutrons is of the same order of magnitude as the transfer of<br />

energy and this is why neutron scattering is the classical technique for this type of<br />

study. The relative resolution needed in X-ray scattering is on the other hand of<br />

the order of magnitude 10 −7 . The achievement of such a high resolution is amazing,<br />

however the resolution in absolute values is still far from matching that obtained by<br />

high resolution neutron scattering.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!