23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 Boson Peak<br />

In figure 8.6 we show the relative peak shift with pressure of transverse sound modes,<br />

longitudinal sound modes at low and high Qs and of the boson peak, as a function<br />

of pressure. All modes are shifted to higher frequency with increasing pressure. We<br />

have calculated the change in density with pressure using the equation of state of<br />

Sanchez and Cho [1995] in the melt and the expansion coefficient α P = 10 −4 K −1 at<br />

all pressures in the glass. Defining the Gruneisen parameter as dlog ω peak<br />

d log ρ<br />

we find a<br />

value of 2.7 and 3.7 for the IXS mode at 2 nm −1 and the boson peak respectively.<br />

This clearly shows that the boson peak is more sensitive to pressure than any of<br />

the other modes. This result is consistent with the result of Schroeder et al. [2004]<br />

who find that changes of the boson peak frequency in Raman spectra under pressure<br />

were stronger than variations of the sound velocities. On the contrary it is found<br />

in a recent study by Monaco et al. [2006 b] of a permanently compressed inorganic<br />

glass that the shift in the boson peak corresponds to that of the sound speeds (more<br />

precisely they compare to the Debye-frequency, see below for the definition). In the<br />

study by Monaco et al. [2006 b] the density changes were quite small (∼ 6%), while<br />

considerably larger variations (∼ 20%) are achieved in our measurements. This<br />

could be part of the explanation of the different result as it is apparent from figure<br />

8.6 that the differences increase with increasing pressure.<br />

The sound modes measured by BLS are at much smaller frequencies than the boson<br />

peak, while the sound modes measured by IXS are at frequencies of the same order of<br />

magnitude as the boson peak frequency. It could therefore be argued that the boson<br />

peak should be compared to the latter. In line with this, it has been suggested,<br />

based on temperature dependences in silica glass, that the boson peak position is<br />

stronger coupled to the behavior of the high frequency IXS sound modes than the<br />

low frequency BLS sound modes [Masciovecchio et al., 1999]. Our results on PIB<br />

do not support this view as we find that the longitudinal sound speed measured by<br />

BLS agrees with the sound speed found by IXS (figure 8.7). Moreover, the pressure<br />

dependence of the two is the same in the limited pressure range where both are<br />

studied. Based on this we assume that the IXS and the BLS modes have similar<br />

pressure dependences in the whole range, and conclude that the boson peak position<br />

has a more dramatic pressure dependence than the sound modes in the same energy<br />

range.<br />

Note also in figure 8.7 that the position of the boson peak seen in the rDOS is in<br />

the regime where the dispersion of the longitudinal sound is linear.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!