Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
152 Boson Peak<br />
In figure 8.6 we show the relative peak shift with pressure of transverse sound modes,<br />
longitudinal sound modes at low and high Qs and of the boson peak, as a function<br />
of pressure. All modes are shifted to higher frequency with increasing pressure. We<br />
have calculated the change in density with pressure using the equation of state of<br />
Sanchez and Cho [1995] in the melt and the expansion coefficient α P = 10 −4 K −1 at<br />
all pressures in the glass. Defining the Gruneisen parameter as dlog ω peak<br />
d log ρ<br />
we find a<br />
value of 2.7 and 3.7 for the IXS mode at 2 nm −1 and the boson peak respectively.<br />
This clearly shows that the boson peak is more sensitive to pressure than any of<br />
the other modes. This result is consistent with the result of Schroeder et al. [2004]<br />
who find that changes of the boson peak frequency in Raman spectra under pressure<br />
were stronger than variations of the sound velocities. On the contrary it is found<br />
in a recent study by Monaco et al. [2006 b] of a permanently compressed inorganic<br />
glass that the shift in the boson peak corresponds to that of the sound speeds (more<br />
precisely they compare to the Debye-frequency, see below for the definition). In the<br />
study by Monaco et al. [2006 b] the density changes were quite small (∼ 6%), while<br />
considerably larger variations (∼ 20%) are achieved in our measurements. This<br />
could be part of the explanation of the different result as it is apparent from figure<br />
8.6 that the differences increase with increasing pressure.<br />
The sound modes measured by BLS are at much smaller frequencies than the boson<br />
peak, while the sound modes measured by IXS are at frequencies of the same order of<br />
magnitude as the boson peak frequency. It could therefore be argued that the boson<br />
peak should be compared to the latter. In line with this, it has been suggested,<br />
based on temperature dependences in silica glass, that the boson peak position is<br />
stronger coupled to the behavior of the high frequency IXS sound modes than the<br />
low frequency BLS sound modes [Masciovecchio et al., 1999]. Our results on PIB<br />
do not support this view as we find that the longitudinal sound speed measured by<br />
BLS agrees with the sound speed found by IXS (figure 8.7). Moreover, the pressure<br />
dependence of the two is the same in the limited pressure range where both are<br />
studied. Based on this we assume that the IXS and the BLS modes have similar<br />
pressure dependences in the whole range, and conclude that the boson peak position<br />
has a more dramatic pressure dependence than the sound modes in the same energy<br />
range.<br />
Note also in figure 8.7 that the position of the boson peak seen in the rDOS is in<br />
the regime where the dispersion of the longitudinal sound is linear.