Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8.3. Boson Peak and fragility 163<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
S(omega)/S(ω BP<br />
)<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
P=1400 MPa<br />
Patm<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
ω / ω BP<br />
Figure 8.15: The boson peak of PIB3580 at atmospheric pressure and at 1.4 GPa<br />
at T ≈ T g (P). The axis are scaled with the boson peak position and intensity. The<br />
data are corrected for the temperature dependent bosefactor.<br />
from this scaling that R is independent of pressure. Two systems are not sufficient<br />
to state that this is a universal behavior of R. However if the finding is general, then<br />
it strongly supports the suggestion that the correlation between R and the isochoric<br />
fragility m ρ , as the latter also stays constant as a function of pressure along the<br />
T g -line (chapter 3).<br />
8.3.3 The quasi-elastic intensity<br />
The quantity R is a measure of the boson peak intensity relative to the minimum<br />
intensity at the low energy side of the peak. This latter is sometimes clearly influenced<br />
by quasi elastic scattering. It is therefore not a priori the boson peak intensity<br />
that determines R. In figures 8.18 and 8.19 we show the S(ω) of two liquids which<br />
both follow the correlations seen in figures 8.11 and 8.12 namely DBP and DHIQ.<br />
For both samples we show the data at T = 100 K and at T = T g = 180 K, (all<br />
data at atmospheric pressure). The spectra deep in the glass at T = 100 K are<br />
quite similar for the two liquids, while this is not the case at T g . For the less fragile<br />
DBP the main effect is an increase in intensity due to the temperature dependence<br />
of the bose factor. In the case of the very fragile DHIQ on the other hand, there is<br />
a quasi-elastic signal at T g which totally swarms the boson peak. Hence, it is this<br />
quasi-elastic signal, rather than the nature of the boson peak which gives DHIQ its<br />
large value of R. This observation questions the proposed relation between R and