23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2. Empirical scaling law and some consequences 31<br />

Equation 3.1.5 shows that the difference between m P and m ρ is determined by the<br />

ratio of two expansivities, α τ and α P . However, the difference is not determined<br />

by thermodynamics alone because α τ contains dynamical information as well, since<br />

it is necessary to know the slope of the isochrone (e.g. the glass transition line) in<br />

order to evaluate it.<br />

Turning now to the phenomenology, it is well known that α P is positive 2 ; α τ on the<br />

other hand is negative because density increases as with increasing temperature when<br />

moving along an isochrone (see figure 3.1 a). By inserting these simple empirical<br />

facts in equation 3.1.5 can be seen that the isobaric fragility is larger than the<br />

isochoric fragility.<br />

3.2 Empirical scaling law and some consequences<br />

Within the last decade a substantial amount of relaxation time and viscosity data<br />

has been collected at different temperatures and pressures/densities, mainly by the<br />

use of dielectric spectroscopy. On the basis of the existing data it is relatively well<br />

established that the temperature and density dependence of the relaxation times<br />

can be expressed as first suggested by Alba-Simionesco et al. [2002], as<br />

( ) e(ρ)<br />

τ(ρ, T) = F . (3.2.1)<br />

T<br />

The result is empirical and has been supported by the work of several groups for a<br />

variety of glass-forming liquids and polymers [Alba-Simionesco et al., 2002; Tarjus<br />

et al., 2004 a; Casalini and Roland, 2004; Roland et al., 2005; Dreyfus et al., 2004;<br />

Reiser et al., 2005; Floudas et al., 2006]. See also chapter 5 in this work.<br />

3.2.1 The result and its history<br />

The scaling can also be expressed in terms of the activation energy defined in equation<br />

2.1.2. In fact is was first proposed in its general form from the idea of reducing<br />

the influence of density on the slowing down to a single density dependent activation<br />

energy scale [Alba-Simionesco et al., 2002; Alba-Simionesco and Tarjus, 2006]:<br />

( )<br />

E(ρ, T) T<br />

E ∞ (ρ) = Φ . (3.2.2)<br />

E ∞ (ρ)<br />

2 Except for tetrahedral systems at certain temperatures, eg. water below 4 ◦ C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!