Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.2. Empirical scaling law and some consequences 31<br />
Equation 3.1.5 shows that the difference between m P and m ρ is determined by the<br />
ratio of two expansivities, α τ and α P . However, the difference is not determined<br />
by thermodynamics alone because α τ contains dynamical information as well, since<br />
it is necessary to know the slope of the isochrone (e.g. the glass transition line) in<br />
order to evaluate it.<br />
Turning now to the phenomenology, it is well known that α P is positive 2 ; α τ on the<br />
other hand is negative because density increases as with increasing temperature when<br />
moving along an isochrone (see figure 3.1 a). By inserting these simple empirical<br />
facts in equation 3.1.5 can be seen that the isobaric fragility is larger than the<br />
isochoric fragility.<br />
3.2 Empirical scaling law and some consequences<br />
Within the last decade a substantial amount of relaxation time and viscosity data<br />
has been collected at different temperatures and pressures/densities, mainly by the<br />
use of dielectric spectroscopy. On the basis of the existing data it is relatively well<br />
established that the temperature and density dependence of the relaxation times<br />
can be expressed as first suggested by Alba-Simionesco et al. [2002], as<br />
( ) e(ρ)<br />
τ(ρ, T) = F . (3.2.1)<br />
T<br />
The result is empirical and has been supported by the work of several groups for a<br />
variety of glass-forming liquids and polymers [Alba-Simionesco et al., 2002; Tarjus<br />
et al., 2004 a; Casalini and Roland, 2004; Roland et al., 2005; Dreyfus et al., 2004;<br />
Reiser et al., 2005; Floudas et al., 2006]. See also chapter 5 in this work.<br />
3.2.1 The result and its history<br />
The scaling can also be expressed in terms of the activation energy defined in equation<br />
2.1.2. In fact is was first proposed in its general form from the idea of reducing<br />
the influence of density on the slowing down to a single density dependent activation<br />
energy scale [Alba-Simionesco et al., 2002; Alba-Simionesco and Tarjus, 2006]:<br />
( )<br />
E(ρ, T) T<br />
E ∞ (ρ) = Φ . (3.2.2)<br />
E ∞ (ρ)<br />
2 Except for tetrahedral systems at certain temperatures, eg. water below 4 ◦ C.