23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 Experimental techniques and observables<br />

In the above we ignore the non-zero contribution of the second term in equation<br />

4.3.22. Another approach which we shall actually use in chapter 6 is to separate<br />

the elastic and the inelastic part of the intensity by fitting the total result to a<br />

sum of two functions. This latter approach requires some assumption regarding the<br />

dynamics of the system in order to choose a proper function for the inelastic part of<br />

the signal.<br />

The experimental intermediate scattering function, I exp (Q, t) found from the inverse<br />

Fourier transform of the experimental dynamic structure factor, decays to zero at<br />

t ≈ ∆ω, where ∆ω is the width of the resolution function. This effect can in principle<br />

be corrected by deconvolution with the resolution function<br />

I(Q, t) =<br />

I(Q, t)<br />

R(t)<br />

where R(t) =<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

R(ω)exp(iωt)dt (4.3.47)<br />

but we can never get any reliable information about dynamics slower than 1/(∆ω).<br />

The resolution function therefore determines the timescale of the experiment. Figure<br />

4.3.10 illustrates how two different dynamical structure factors which cannot be<br />

distinguished with a given experiment, because the difference is on a timescale which<br />

is not accessed with the given resolution.<br />

sample<br />

S(Q, ω)<br />

experimental<br />

S(Q, ω)<br />

sample<br />

I(Q, t)<br />

experimental<br />

I(Q, t)<br />

sample<br />

S(Q, ω)<br />

experimental<br />

S(Q, ω)<br />

sample<br />

I(Q, t)<br />

experimental<br />

I(Q, t)<br />

Figure 4.3: The figure illustrates two different dynamical structure factors which<br />

cannot be distinguished with a given experiment, because the difference is on a<br />

timescale which is not accessed with the given resolution. The left figure shows the<br />

dynamical structure factor at fixed Q as a function of temperature. The right figures<br />

show the intermediate scattering function at fixed Q as a function of logarithm of<br />

the time. Upper figures: The dynamical structure factor of the sample has a a delta<br />

function at zero energy transfer and the actual intermediate scattering function of<br />

the sample never decays to zero. Lower figures: There is a slight broadening of<br />

the central peak seen in dynamical structure factor and the intermediate scattering<br />

function decays to zero at long times.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!