Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
78 Alpha Relaxation<br />
for the 1 s isochrone in [Paluch et al., 2003 a]. Along this 100 s isochrone we calculate<br />
α τ and determine<br />
d log e(ρ)<br />
dlog ρ<br />
from<br />
d log e(ρ)<br />
d log ρ<br />
= 1/(T g |α τ |). From this we determine<br />
ln(e(ρ)) (up to an additive constant) by integrating dln(e(ρ))<br />
ln ρ<br />
d(ln(ρ)), and ln(e(ρ))<br />
is finally converted by e(ρ) = exp(ln(e(ρ))). This gives e(ρ) with an arbitrary<br />
multiplicative constant. The quality of the data collapse is independent of this<br />
constant, as it only depends on the density dependence of e(ρ) not on its absolute<br />
value. In figure 5.7 we show the data as a function of e(ρ)/T, using the e(ρ) found<br />
from this construction. The constructed e(ρ) has an apparent “power-law” exponent<br />
x(ρ) = dloge(ρ)/dlogρ that increases from 1.5 to 3.5 with density in the range<br />
considered. It is seen that this makes the higher density data fall reasonably well<br />
on the master curve and that gives an even better collapse in the low density region<br />
than with the scaling with a simple power law.<br />
As a last note regarding the e(ρ)/T-scaling in figure 5.7, we want to stress that we<br />
cannot test the scaling (Eq. 3.2.1) in the density range above 1.25 g/cm 3 where<br />
there is only one set of data. Indeed, with a unique set of data in a given range of<br />
density it is always possible to construct e(ρ) in this range to make the data overlap<br />
with data taken in other density ranges.<br />
We have determined the ratio between the isochoric fragility and the isobaric fragility<br />
at atmospheric pressure by calculating α τ along the isochrone of 100 s and inserting it<br />
in equation 3.1.5. This leads to m P /m ρ ≈ 1.2, when m P is the atmospheric-pressure<br />
fragility. In figure 5.8 we show the isobaric data taken at atmospheric pressure and<br />
at 230 MPa scaled by their respective T g (P). No significant pressure dependence of<br />
the isobaric fragility is observed when going from atmospheric pressure to 230 MPa,<br />
which is consistent with the result of Sekula et al. [2004]. The pressure independence<br />
of m P is connected to the relatively low value of m P /m ρ = 1.2, (typical values<br />
are 1.2-2 [Alba-Simionesco et al., 2002]); m ρ is pressure independent and the ratio<br />
m P /m ρ cannot be lower than one (see Eq. 3.1.5), so that m P can at most decrease<br />
by 20% from its atmospheric-pressure value. Moreover, the increase in dln(e(ρ))<br />
ln ρ<br />
with<br />
density will tend to cancel the decrease in α P T g , which is usually responsible for the<br />
decrease in fragility with increasing pressure.<br />
5.2.2 m-Toluidine<br />
The glass transition temperature at atmospheric pressure is T g = 187 K and the<br />
isobaric fragility based on dielectric spectra is reported to be m P = 82±3 [Mandanici<br />
et al., 2005; Alba-Simionesco et al., 1999]. (There has been some controversy on the<br />
dielectric relaxation in m-toluidine at atmospheric pressure, see [Carpentier et al.,