23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3<br />

What we learn from pressure<br />

experiments<br />

In this chapter we first introduce earlier results on density and pressure dependence<br />

of the alpha relaxation (section 3.1 and 3.2) and next develope a framework in order<br />

to better understand different types of correlations with fragility (section 3.3 and<br />

3.4).<br />

The steepness index is mostly used as a measure of fragility, but the results and<br />

arguments, hold for other types of fragility criteria, e.g. the Olsen index just as<br />

well.<br />

3.1 Isochoric and isobaric fragility<br />

The measures of fragility which we introduce in section 2.2 are in their original form<br />

(implicitly) defined at constant atmospheric pressure because this is where most<br />

experiments are performed. For instance the steepness index is actually<br />

m P = ∂ log 10(τ)<br />

∂ T τ /T<br />

∣ (T = T τ ) (3.1.1)<br />

P<br />

where the derivative is to be evaluated at T τ . T τ is defined as being the temperature<br />

at which the relaxation time reaches the value τ, e.g. τ = 100 s. The conventional<br />

fragility is hence the atmospheric pressure isobaric fragility. However, the relaxation<br />

time can also be measured as a function of temperature along other isobars. This<br />

is illustrated in figure 3.1 where it can also be seen that the T τ (P) increases when<br />

pressure increases. Isobaric fragility is well defined at any point on the isochronic<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!