23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144 Boson Peak<br />

the Qout<br />

Q in<br />

factor (see equation 4.3.17 ). INX is moreover used for correcting for the<br />

different detector efficiency by normalizing to the signal of a vanadium sample, it<br />

performs corrections for sample absorption, and subtracts a measured background<br />

signal.<br />

Subtraction of the empty cell<br />

The signal of the aluminum cell is negligible as compared to the signal of the hydrogenated<br />

sample. The procedure used for subtraction is therefore without significance<br />

for the final result. The pressure cell on the other hand, gives a significant signal<br />

(see also the discussion in 7.1.2). In figure 8.1 we illustrate the raw signal of sample<br />

plus pressure cell along with the signal of the pressure cell 1 .<br />

We are mostly interested in the energy region 1 meV - 10 meV. The cell signal in this<br />

region is a flat background with considerable lower intensity than the signal of the<br />

sample. The intensity of the cell signal becomes comparable in order of magnitude<br />

at energies somewhere around 15 meV. We therefore conclude that the result after<br />

subtraction of the cell is reliable up to ∼ 15 meV, while we exclude higher energies<br />

from the analysis. The elastic signal is also shown in figure 8.1. Here we see,<br />

consistent with the backscattering data, that the high pressure cell contributes with<br />

about half of the measured intensity.<br />

8.1.3 Determining S(ω) and g(ω)<br />

The discussion of the time of flight data in this chapter is based on S(ω) obtained by<br />

normalizing to the elastic intensity and summing over all measured angles. In the<br />

following section we justify this procedure by showing that it gives less scattered data<br />

than interpolating to constant Q before summing, while the results are equivalent.<br />

The data are interpolated from the measured I(θ, ω) to the I(Q, ω) using the program<br />

IDA. We neglect coherent scattering which means that the measured intensity<br />

is proportional to the incoherent dynamical structure factor:<br />

I(Q, ω) = N σ inc<br />

4π S inc(Q, ω) (8.1.1)<br />

where N is the number of scatterers and σ inc is the incoherent scattering cross<br />

section (see equation 4.3.17 and recall that the Qout<br />

Q in<br />

factor was corrected by INX).<br />

1 The presence of the sample gives a “shadow” and hence less scatter (∼ 10%) from the cell, in<br />

the cell+sample situation as compared to the empty cell alone. The cell signal shown in figure 8.1<br />

has been corrected to take this effect into account.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!