23.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2. Relaxation time 75<br />

Data treatment<br />

The relaxation time is determined from a polynomial fit of the logarithm of the loss<br />

as function of the logarithm of the frequency. The fit is performed over less than a<br />

decade around the top. The further treatment, e.g. evaluation of the fragility and<br />

analysis of the spectra shape, is discussed in detail in the course of the chapter.<br />

5.2 Relaxation time<br />

5.2.1 Dibutyl phtalate<br />

The relaxation time of DBP at atmospheric pressure is shown in figure 5.2 along<br />

with literature results. T g (P atm ) = 177 K, when defined as the temperature where<br />

τ α = 100 s. We also present the data taken at P = 230 MPa in this figure. It is clearly<br />

seen that T g increases with pressure. An extrapolation of the data to τ α = 100 s<br />

gives T g = 200 K for P = 230 MPa, corresponding to dT g /dP = 0.1 K.MPa −1 . This<br />

corresponds well to the pressure dependence of T g (at τ α = 1 s) reported by Sekula<br />

et al. [2004], based on measurements taken at pressures higher than 600 MPa. It<br />

is however a stronger pressure dependence than dT g /dP = 0.06 K.MPa −1 reported<br />

by Fujimori et al. [1997] based on isothermal calorimetry. This indicates that the<br />

calorimetric and the dielectric relaxation may have somewhat different dependence<br />

of density.<br />

In figure 5.3 we illustrate the determination of T g and of the fragility m P for the<br />

atmospheric-pressure data, using the part of the atmospheric-pressure data of figure<br />

5.2 where the relaxation time is longer than a millisecond. Along with the data<br />

we show the VTF fit (equation 2.2.2) from Sekula et al. [2004] extrapolated to low<br />

temperatures, which gives T g = 177.4 K and m P = 84. We have also performed<br />

a new VTF fit restricted to the data in the 10 −6 s−10 2 s region. The result of<br />

this fit yields T g = 176.6 K and m P = 82. Finally, we have made a simple linear<br />

estimate of log 10 τ α as a function of 1/T in the temperature range shown in the<br />

figure. This linear slope fits the data close to T g better than any of the VTF fits.<br />

The corresponding glass transition temperature and fragility are T g = 176 K and<br />

m P = 70. This illustrates that the determination of T g is rather robust while this<br />

is less so for the fragility. This latter depends on how it is obtained, and the use of<br />

extrapolated VTF fits can lead to an overestimation. (Of course, a VTF fit made<br />

over a very narrow range, e.g. 10 −2 s − 10 2 s, will agree with the linear fit, because<br />

the VTF becomes essentially linear over the relevant range.) The fragility of DBP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!