Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
Ph.D. thesis (pdf) - dirac
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.2. Relaxation time 75<br />
Data treatment<br />
The relaxation time is determined from a polynomial fit of the logarithm of the loss<br />
as function of the logarithm of the frequency. The fit is performed over less than a<br />
decade around the top. The further treatment, e.g. evaluation of the fragility and<br />
analysis of the spectra shape, is discussed in detail in the course of the chapter.<br />
5.2 Relaxation time<br />
5.2.1 Dibutyl phtalate<br />
The relaxation time of DBP at atmospheric pressure is shown in figure 5.2 along<br />
with literature results. T g (P atm ) = 177 K, when defined as the temperature where<br />
τ α = 100 s. We also present the data taken at P = 230 MPa in this figure. It is clearly<br />
seen that T g increases with pressure. An extrapolation of the data to τ α = 100 s<br />
gives T g = 200 K for P = 230 MPa, corresponding to dT g /dP = 0.1 K.MPa −1 . This<br />
corresponds well to the pressure dependence of T g (at τ α = 1 s) reported by Sekula<br />
et al. [2004], based on measurements taken at pressures higher than 600 MPa. It<br />
is however a stronger pressure dependence than dT g /dP = 0.06 K.MPa −1 reported<br />
by Fujimori et al. [1997] based on isothermal calorimetry. This indicates that the<br />
calorimetric and the dielectric relaxation may have somewhat different dependence<br />
of density.<br />
In figure 5.3 we illustrate the determination of T g and of the fragility m P for the<br />
atmospheric-pressure data, using the part of the atmospheric-pressure data of figure<br />
5.2 where the relaxation time is longer than a millisecond. Along with the data<br />
we show the VTF fit (equation 2.2.2) from Sekula et al. [2004] extrapolated to low<br />
temperatures, which gives T g = 177.4 K and m P = 84. We have also performed<br />
a new VTF fit restricted to the data in the 10 −6 s−10 2 s region. The result of<br />
this fit yields T g = 176.6 K and m P = 82. Finally, we have made a simple linear<br />
estimate of log 10 τ α as a function of 1/T in the temperature range shown in the<br />
figure. This linear slope fits the data close to T g better than any of the VTF fits.<br />
The corresponding glass transition temperature and fragility are T g = 176 K and<br />
m P = 70. This illustrates that the determination of T g is rather robust while this<br />
is less so for the fragility. This latter depends on how it is obtained, and the use of<br />
extrapolated VTF fits can lead to an overestimation. (Of course, a VTF fit made<br />
over a very narrow range, e.g. 10 −2 s − 10 2 s, will agree with the linear fit, because<br />
the VTF becomes essentially linear over the relevant range.) The fragility of DBP