MAKE IT LAST FOREVER: THE ... - National Service Resource Center

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Checkoway, B. (1997). “Institutional Impacts of AmeriCorps on the University of Michigan.” Journal of Public Service and Outreach 1: 70-79. Cushman, E. (1999, January). “The Public Intellectual, Service Learning, and Activist Research.” College English 61 no.3. Driscoll, A., B. Holland, S. Gelmon, and S. Kerrigan. “An Assessment Model for Service-Learning: Comprehensive Case Studies of Impact on Faculty, Students, Community, and Institutions.” Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning 3: 66-71. Furco, A. (1994). “ A Conceptual Framework for the Institutionalization of Youth Service Programs in Primary and Secondary Education.” Journal of Adolescence 17: 395-409. Greene, D. and Diehm, G. “Educational and Service Outcomes of a Service Integration Effort.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 2: 54-62. Miles, M. (1983, November). “Unraveling the Mystery of Institutionalization.” Educational Leadership: 14-19. Moskal, B (2000). “Scoring Rubrics: What, When, and How?” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7 No.3. O’Bannon, F. (1999). “Service Learning Benefits our Schools.” State Education Leader 17 no.3. Denver: Education Commission of the States. Serow, R., Calleson, D. and Morgan, C (1996). “Institutional Support for Service Learning.” Journal of Research and Development in Education 29 no. 4: 220-25. Ward, K. “ Service Learning and Student Volunteerism: Reflections on Institutional Commitment.” Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning 3. Zlotkowski, E. (1996). “ A New Voice at the Table? Linking Service-Learning and the Academy.” Change 28 No.1: 20-27. C. Papers/Pamphlets Alliance for Service-Learning in Education Reform (1993). “Standards of Quality for School-Based Service-Learning.” Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers. Anderson, J. and Pickeral, T. (1999). “Challenges and Strategies for Success With Service-Learning in Preservice Teacher Education.” Washington, D.C.: Corporation for National Service. Andersen, S. (1998). “Service Learning: A National Strategy for Youth Development.” Washington, D.C.: Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, www.gwu.edu/~ccps/pop_svc.html 124
Andersen, S. and Murphy, N. (1999). “Mandatory Community Service: Citizenship Education or Involuntary Servitude?” Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Bringle, R. and Hatcher, J. (1997). “Institutionalization of Service-Learning in Higher Education.” Unpublished manuscript. CalServe (1999) “Continuum for Sustainable Partnerships,” Draft. Sacramento: California Department of Education Chapman, C. (1999). “Service Learning and Community Service in K-12 Public Schools.” Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. Eyler, J., Giles, D., Jr., and Gray, C. (1999). “At a Glance: What We Know about The Effects of Service-Learning in Students, Faculty, Institutions, and Communities, 1993-1999.” Paper presented at 2000 National Service Learning Conference, Providence, RI. Furco, A. (1999). “Self-Assessment Rubric for the Institutionalization of Service Learning in Higher Education.” Berkeley, CA: University of California - Berkeley. Gomez, B. (1997). “Connecting Service Learning and School-to-Career Initiatives.”, Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers. Gomez, B. (1999). “Service-Learning: Every Child a Citizen.” Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Honnet, E. and Poulsen, S. (1989). “Principles of Good Practice for Combining Service and Learning.” Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation. Institute for the Study of Government and the Nonprofit Sector, Indiana University (1999). “A Review of Service-Related Research 1990-1999.” Paper presented at 2000 National Service Learning Conference, Providence, RI. Kinsley, C., Southworth, A., and Boston, B. (1999). “Service-Learning: An Education Strategy for Preventing School Violence.: Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Maine Department of Education (1999). “Goals 2000 Learning Results Implementation Grant Self-Assessment.” Maloy, R. and Wohleb, B. (1997). “Implementing Community Service in K-12 Schools: A Report on Policies and Practices in the Eastern Region.” Boston, MA: Eastern Regional Information Center, University of Massachusetts School of Education. National Service Learning Cooperative (1998). “Essential Elements of Service Learning.” Roseville, MN: National Youth Leadership Council. 125
Page 1 and 2:
MAKE IT LAST FOREVER: THE INSTITUTI
Page 3 and 4:
I recognize the following organizat
Page 5 and 6:
Creating the Institutionalization S
Page 7 and 8:
Since the inception of the Corporat
Page 9 and 10:
kind of systemic change they wish t
Page 11 and 12:
integration (8 states). It should b
Page 13 and 14:
service-learning attained its prope
Page 15 and 16:
However, organizations, like people
Page 17 and 18:
Department of Education. The polici
Page 19 and 20:
What are the key features of natura
Page 21 and 22:
However, several issues have emerge
Page 23 and 24:
Corporation for National Service, s
Page 25 and 26:
ability of schools to demonstrate,
Page 27 and 28:
is integrated into academic curricu
Page 29 and 30:
FUNCTION #2: PROFICIENCY support or
Page 31 and 32:
academic subjects. Some states focu
Page 33 and 34:
part of teaching and learning, and
Page 35 and 36:
transportation. Teacher minigrants
Page 37 and 38:
Links to Educational Restructuring
Page 39 and 40:
Curricular integration: Aspect of a
Page 41 and 42:
In progress CA, IN Missoula (MT) Li
Page 43 and 44:
Conference (other) OK, NM, MA, MD,
Page 45 and 46:
Subgrants for strategic planning CO
Page 47 and 48:
State Commission for National and C
Page 49 and 50:
Albuquerque (NM), Laurens County (S
Page 51 and 52:
AmeriCorps members on site Santa Fe
Page 53 and 54:
Students do project logistics for e
Page 55 and 56:
Reflection Book of projects Superin
Page 57 and 58:
Invite legislators to see projects
Page 59 and 60:
The Important categories include: P
Page 61 and 62:
SERVICE-LEARNING INSTITUTIONALIZATI
Page 63 and 64:
DC: FL: HI: ID: Innovative Features
Page 65 and 66:
MD: MA: MN: Innovative Features: No
Page 67 and 68:
RI: SC: Innovative Features: Studen
Page 69 and 70:
Innovative Features: Students teach
Page 71 and 72:
Colorado: provides on-demand school
Page 73 and 74: Vermont: has outgrown need for stat
Page 75 and 76: CURRICULAR INTEGRATION: SCHOOL DIST
Page 77 and 78: SCHOOL & LOGISTICAL STRUCTURES: SCH
Page 79 and 80: SCHOOL DISTRICT Service is of mild
Page 81 and 82: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE FUNCTION 2: P
Page 83 and 84: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE FUNCTION 2: P
Page 85 and 86: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE FUNCTION 3: L
Page 87 and 88: NON-PROFIT PERSONNEL: SCHOOL DISTRI
Page 89 and 90: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE FUNCTION 3: L
Page 91 and 92: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE Students are
Page 93 and 94: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE The school li
Page 95 and 96: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE The school pr
Page 97 and 98: SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE The school le
Page 99 and 100: Teachers Teachers Teachers Recipien
Page 101 and 102: Links to Educational Standards: Pro
Page 103 and 104: Evidence of Impact: Resources: SUPP
Page 105 and 106: the following design principles, wh
Page 107 and 108: are not part of the curriculum or f
Page 109 and 110: MACHINES POPULAR APPROACH TO SERVIC
Page 111 and 112: HOW DO CATEGORIES SUPPORT THE FUNCT
Page 113 and 114: HOW DO CATEGORIES SUPPORT THE FUNCT
Page 115 and 116: (8) Schools which have received Lea
Page 117 and 118: and standardized tests. It should l
Page 119 and 120: (5) Schools should have service-lea
Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX 121
Page 123: BIBLIOGRAPHY I. PRINT A. Books Serv
Page 127 and 128: State Alabama Department of Educati
Page 129 and 130: CALIFORNIA CalServe/Department of E
Page 131 and 132: VERMONT: Guilford ES/Community Work
Page 133: SOUTHWEST COLORADO: Alamosa HS Comm
show all

MAKE IT LAST FOREVER: THE ... - National Service Resource Center

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?