State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental
State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental
State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> & Langebaan Lagoon <strong>2011</strong><br />
List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />
Figure 5.5.<br />
Figure 5.6.<br />
Figure 5.7.<br />
Figure 5.8.<br />
Figure 5.9.<br />
Figure 5.10.<br />
Figure 6.1.<br />
Figure 6.2.<br />
Figure 6.3.<br />
Figure 6.4<br />
Figure 6.5.<br />
Figure 6.6<br />
Figure 6.7<br />
and blue lines) is indicative <strong>of</strong> improving water quality, while an upward slope in<br />
<strong>the</strong>se lines in indicative <strong>of</strong> decreasing water quality. .............................................. 68<br />
Faecal coliform and E. coli logarithmic counts at 4 sampling stations within Big <strong>Bay</strong><br />
(Feb 1999-Feb 2012). A Downward slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regression (solid red and blue<br />
lines) is indicative <strong>of</strong> improving water quality, while an upward slope in <strong>the</strong>se lines<br />
in indicative <strong>of</strong> decreasing water quality. ................................................................. 69<br />
Faecal coliform and E. coli logarithmic counts at 3 sampling stations within<br />
Langebaan Lagoon (Feb 1999-Feb 2012). A Downward slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regression<br />
(solid red and blue lines) is indicative <strong>of</strong> improving water quality, while an upward<br />
slope in <strong>the</strong>se lines in indicative <strong>of</strong> decreasing water quality. ................................. 70<br />
Faecal coliform and E. coli logarithmic counts at 3 sampling stations within<br />
Langebaan Lagoon (Feb 1999-Feb 2012). A Downward slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regression<br />
(solid red and blue lines) is indicative <strong>of</strong> improving water quality, while an upward<br />
slope in <strong>the</strong>se lines in indicative <strong>of</strong> decreasing water quality. ................................. 71<br />
An illustration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed routine monitoring programme to be trialled in<br />
South Africa. Source: South African Water Quality Guidelines for Coastal Marine<br />
Waters (RSADEA <strong>2011</strong>). ............................................................................................ 73<br />
Trace metal concentrations in mussels collected from five sites in Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mussel Watch Programme. (Source <strong>of</strong> data: G. Kiviets, Marine and<br />
Coastal Management, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Affairs and Tourism).<br />
Recommended maximum limits for trace metals in seafood as stipulated in South<br />
African legislation are shown as a dotted red line. .................................................. 78<br />
Concentrations <strong>of</strong> Cadmium, Lead and Mercury in mussels and oysters from four<br />
bivalve culture operations in Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> covering <strong>the</strong> period 1993 to 2010.<br />
Recommended maximum limits for trace metals in seafood as stipulated in South<br />
African legislation are shown as a dotted red line. .................................................. 79<br />
A) Under natural circumstances, dune vegetation can “move” with <strong>the</strong> beach as it<br />
erodes and accrete under <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> natural processes. B) Protection <strong>of</strong><br />
infrastructure erected too close to <strong>the</strong> high water mark, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand,<br />
necessitates construction <strong>of</strong> artificial barriers and leads to <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beach<br />
ecosystem and associated amenities. ...................................................................... 83<br />
Graph showing <strong>the</strong> relative change in area over time for Spreeuwalle and<br />
Langebaan Beach (1960 – 2012). .............................................................................. 84<br />
Spreeuwalle beach showing <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transect line in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
beach (Source: Gericke 2012). .................................................................................. 84<br />
Variation in beach width across a transect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central section <strong>of</strong> Spreeuwalle<br />
beach (Source: Gericke 2012). .................................................................................. 85<br />
Rock revetments constructed along <strong>the</strong> beach at Langebaan in an effort to protect<br />
coastal infrastructure. .............................................................................................. 86<br />
Groyne construction site Langebaan north beach. 1st groyne is completed and<br />
position <strong>of</strong> 2nd groyne is show in white. Area A and B are sand “slurry” sites (see<br />
text for explanation). Area C sand dredging site for beach reclamation. Source:<br />
Prestedge Retief Dresner Wijnberg. ......................................................................... 87<br />
<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beach north <strong>of</strong> Groyne 2 in May 2010. (view looking south from <strong>the</strong><br />
middle <strong>of</strong> Leentjiesklip 1 beach towards <strong>the</strong> groyne) .............................................. 88<br />
viii<br />
ANCHOR<br />
e n v i r o n m en t a l