08.01.2015 Views

State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental

State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental

State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> & Langebaan Lagoon <strong>2011</strong><br />

Water quality<br />

The currents and circulation <strong>of</strong> Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> subsequent to <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Marcus<br />

Island causeway and <strong>the</strong> iron ore/oil Terminal were described by Weeks et al. (1991a). Historical<br />

data <strong>of</strong> drogue tracking collected by <strong>the</strong> Sea Fisheries Research Institute during 1976-1979 were<br />

analysed in this paper. This study confirmed that wind is <strong>the</strong> primary determinant <strong>of</strong> surface<br />

currents in both Small <strong>Bay</strong> and Big <strong>Bay</strong>; although tidal flows do influence currents below <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>rmocline and are <strong>the</strong> dominant forcing factor in <strong>the</strong> proximity <strong>of</strong> Langebaan Lagoon. Weeks et al.<br />

(1991a) noted that because much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> drogue tracking was conducted under conditions <strong>of</strong> weak or<br />

moderate wind speeds, <strong>the</strong> surface current velocities measured (5-20cm.s -1 ), were probably<br />

underestimated. The authors concluded that <strong>the</strong> harbour construction had constrained water<br />

circulation within Small <strong>Bay</strong>, enhancing <strong>the</strong> general clockwise pattern and increasing current speeds<br />

along <strong>the</strong> boundaries, particularly <strong>the</strong> south-westward current flow along <strong>the</strong> iron ore/oil Terminal<br />

(Figure 4.1B). More recent data collected during strong NNE wind conditions in August 1990<br />

revealed that greater wind velocities do indeed influence current strength and direction throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> water column (Weeks et al. 1991b). These strong NNE winds were observed to enhance <strong>the</strong><br />

surface flowing SSW currents along <strong>the</strong> ore terminal in Small <strong>Bay</strong> (out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>), but resulted in a<br />

northward replacement flow (into <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>) along <strong>the</strong> bottom, under both ebb and flood tides. The<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> wind as <strong>the</strong> dominant forcing factor <strong>of</strong> bottom, as well as surface, waters was fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

confirmed by Monteiro and Largier (1999) who described <strong>the</strong> density driven inflow-outflow <strong>of</strong> cold<br />

bottom water into Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> during summer conditions when prevailing SSW winds cause<br />

regional scale upwelling.<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> iron ore terminal and <strong>the</strong> Marcus Island causeway altered <strong>the</strong> wave<br />

exposure zones evident in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>. Prior to harbour development in Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong>, Flemming (1977)<br />

distinguished four wave-energy zones in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>, defined as being a centrally exposed zone in <strong>the</strong><br />

area directly opposite <strong>the</strong> entrance to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>, two adjacent semi-exposed zones on ei<strong>the</strong>r side and<br />

a sheltered zone in <strong>the</strong> far nor<strong>the</strong>rn corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> (Figure 4.1A). The iron ore terminal essentially<br />

divided <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> into Small <strong>Bay</strong> and Big <strong>Bay</strong> and altered <strong>the</strong> wave energy and exposure patterns<br />

within <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>. The causeway increased <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> sheltered and semi-sheltered zones in Small<br />

<strong>Bay</strong> with no semi-exposed degree <strong>of</strong> wave energy being present in this area (Luger et al. 1999).<br />

Wave exposure in Big <strong>Bay</strong> was altered less dramatically, however, <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> sheltered and semisheltered<br />

wave exposure areas increased after harbour development (Luger et al. 1999).<br />

4.2 Microbiological monitoring<br />

Faecal pollution contained in, for example, untreated sewage or storm water run<strong>of</strong>f, may introduce<br />

disease-causing micro-organisms into coastal waters. These pathogenic micro-organisms constitute<br />

a threat to recreational water users and consumers <strong>of</strong> seafood. Bacterial indicators are used to<br />

detect <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> faecal pollution. These bacterial indicators, however, only provide indirect<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible presence <strong>of</strong> water borne pathogens and may not accurately represent <strong>the</strong><br />

risk to water users (Monteiro et al. 2000). Historically, <strong>the</strong> DWAF (1995) and (1996b) guidelines for<br />

inland and coastal waters respectively, have been used to assess compliance in respect <strong>of</strong> human<br />

health criteria. However as <strong>of</strong> <strong>2011</strong>, <strong>the</strong>se have been replaced with <strong>the</strong> South African Water Quality<br />

Guidelines for Coastal Marine Waters Volume 2: Interim Guidelines for Recreational Use<br />

(Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Affairs, <strong>2011</strong>).<br />

4.2.1 DWAF 1995 and 1996 guidelines<br />

The DWAF (1995) and (1996b) guidelines for inland and coastal waters respectively, identified three<br />

recreational user groups; full-contact, intermediate-contact and non-contact recreation. Full contact<br />

recreation included swimming and diving among o<strong>the</strong>r activities. Partial-contact recreation covered<br />

59<br />

ANCHOR<br />

e n v i r o n m en t a l

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!