08.01.2015 Views

State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental

State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental

State of the Bay Report 2011-Final.pdf - Anchor Environmental

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> & Langebaan Lagoon <strong>2011</strong><br />

Activities & discharges<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Onshore construction issues: human activity, air, noise and vibration pollution, dust, blasting<br />

and piling driving, disturbance <strong>of</strong> coastal flora and fauna);<br />

Construction and installation <strong>of</strong> a water discharge and intake pipeline issues: construction<br />

site, pipe lay-down areas, trenching <strong>of</strong> pipeline(s) in <strong>the</strong> marine environment and<br />

consequent disturbance <strong>of</strong> subtidal biota); and<br />

Construction and installation <strong>of</strong> intake boreholes.<br />

The issues associated with <strong>the</strong> operational phase included:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

altered flows at <strong>the</strong> discharge resulting in ecological impacts (e.g. flow distortion/changes at<br />

<strong>the</strong> discharge, and affects on natural sediment dynamics);<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> elevated salinities in <strong>the</strong> brine water discharged to <strong>the</strong> bay;<br />

biocidal action <strong>of</strong> non-oxidising biocides such as dibromonitrilopropionamide (DBNPA) in <strong>the</strong><br />

effluent;<br />

<strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> co-discharged waste water constituents, including possible tainting effects<br />

affecting both mariculture activities and fish factory processing in <strong>the</strong> bay;<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discharged effluent having a higher temperature than <strong>the</strong> receiving<br />

environment;<br />

direct changes in dissolved oxygen content due to <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> ambient<br />

dissolved oxygen concentrations and those in <strong>the</strong> discharged effluent; and<br />

indirect changes in dissolved oxygen content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water column and sediments due to<br />

changes in phytoplankton production as a result <strong>of</strong> altered nutrient dynamics (both in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> changes in nutrient inflows and vertical mixing <strong>of</strong> nutrients) and altered remineralisation<br />

rates (with related changes in nutrient concentrations in near bottom waters) associated<br />

with near bottom changes in seawater temperature due to <strong>the</strong> brine discharge plume.<br />

The marine specialist report assessed <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> RO plants with several different designs<br />

at three sites. It was expected that <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> construction at <strong>the</strong> authorized site would be very<br />

low as <strong>the</strong>se construction activities would have utilized existing infrastructure as <strong>the</strong>ir basis and<br />

construction activities would not have been extensive. Operational impacts associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

intake <strong>of</strong> water through boreholes were expected to be insignificant to low. All potential impacts<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> discharge <strong>of</strong> brine through a pipeline at Caisson 3 (<strong>the</strong> authorized site) were<br />

expected to be <strong>of</strong> a low to very low level, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> oxygen scavengers with no<br />

mitigation measures, which was expected to have a medium level impact. A monitoring programme<br />

was outlined in <strong>the</strong> marine specialist report. Aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment which require monitoring<br />

include <strong>the</strong> benthic macr<strong>of</strong>auna communities, dissolved oxygen levels in <strong>the</strong> near bottom waters in<br />

<strong>the</strong> immediate vicinity, trace metals and tainting substances in <strong>the</strong> RO plant effluent, toxicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

effluent, and temperature, salinity and suspended solids in <strong>the</strong> near-field. Monitoring activities<br />

commenced during <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> 2010 in order to establish a baseline prior to <strong>the</strong> RO plant<br />

coming into operation. Follow-up monitoring is planned when <strong>the</strong> plant is finally brought on line.<br />

3.3.6.2 West Coast District Municipality Desalination Plant<br />

The West Coast District Municipality (WCDM) has proposed <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> an additional<br />

RO plant in <strong>the</strong> Saldanha <strong>Bay</strong> area. The West Coast has limited water resources (due to its semi-arid<br />

nature) but yet is required to supply 22 towns and 876 farms across <strong>the</strong> region with potable water.<br />

Currently water is supplied by <strong>the</strong> Voelvlei Dam, Misverstand Dam and <strong>the</strong> Langebaan road aquifer,<br />

however <strong>the</strong> volume allocated from <strong>the</strong>se sources for this is close to <strong>the</strong> maximum possible. During a<br />

feasibility study in 2007 to assess <strong>the</strong> most viable solution to <strong>the</strong> water scarcity issue in <strong>the</strong> WCDM,<br />

several sources <strong>of</strong> additional water were considered. These included:<br />

32<br />

ANCHOR<br />

e n v i r o n m en t a l

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!