12.01.2015 Views

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 Audit Approach<br />

Major<br />

Two non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Major were determined for <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes. Both<br />

involved machinery entry to rainforest buffers and rainforest (C10 and C12). These issues are<br />

discussed in further detail in the Rainforest findings sections of this report.<br />

Moderate<br />

Thirty-one non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Moderate were determined for <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes,<br />

including those related to inadequate topsoil and retention of excess bark at landings; lack of noxious<br />

weed assessments and control; inadequate or inappropriate drainage of sections of roads, snig tracks<br />

and boundary tracks; inadequate management of cut and fill on roads; road construction on steeper<br />

slopes than prescribed for the soil type; crossing of drainage lines without approval; failure to classify<br />

a stream adjacent to a coupe; and an instance of stockpiling of soil for road rehabilitation in a<br />

rainforest buffer without documented and approved plans.<br />

Minor<br />

Twenty-eight non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Minor were determined for <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes,<br />

including those related to inadequate ripping and retention of bark at landings; lack of noxious weed<br />

assessments and control; inadequate drainage of sections of roads, snig tracks and boundary tracks;<br />

instances of debris pushed or rolled into exclusion zones; and trees having been felled into buffers<br />

and pulled out without adequate documentation.<br />

Negligible<br />

A total of 49 non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Negligible were determined during the audit,<br />

spread across most of the Compliance Elements. For <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes, these non-compliances<br />

included instances of litter found on coupes, lack of noxious weed assessments and control, a root ball<br />

having rolled into a habitat area, harvest debris having been pushed up around a designated habitat<br />

tree, failure to close roads and instances of inadequate drainage or rehabilitation of sections of roads,<br />

landings, snig tracks and boundary tracks,<br />

Two non-compliances identified for DSE coupes were determined as having Negligible EIA risk ratings<br />

related to incorrect location and marking of a filter on a temporary stream.<br />

No impact<br />

A total of 40 non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of No impact were determined during the audit,<br />

generally spread across Compliance Elements concerned with planning, but also related to failure to<br />

close roads no longer in use and undertake noxious weed assessments. For <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes,<br />

these non-compliances related to not having planned for noxious weed control, some waterways not<br />

having been classified, use of the wrong tape colour to delineate a buffer, failure to close roads no<br />

longer in use, and vegetation clearance widths not meeting minimum requirements,<br />

For the DSE coupes, non-compliances with No impact risk ratings included not having documented<br />

approvals to temporarily close roads during harvesting, not having assessed soil characteristics for<br />

one coupe, not having undertaken pre-harvest weed assessments and not having considered noxious<br />

weed control in coupe planning.<br />

34 42807504/01/01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!