Module 5 - VicForests
Module 5 - VicForests
Module 5 - VicForests
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 Audit Approach<br />
Major<br />
Two non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Major were determined for <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes. Both<br />
involved machinery entry to rainforest buffers and rainforest (C10 and C12). These issues are<br />
discussed in further detail in the Rainforest findings sections of this report.<br />
Moderate<br />
Thirty-one non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Moderate were determined for <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes,<br />
including those related to inadequate topsoil and retention of excess bark at landings; lack of noxious<br />
weed assessments and control; inadequate or inappropriate drainage of sections of roads, snig tracks<br />
and boundary tracks; inadequate management of cut and fill on roads; road construction on steeper<br />
slopes than prescribed for the soil type; crossing of drainage lines without approval; failure to classify<br />
a stream adjacent to a coupe; and an instance of stockpiling of soil for road rehabilitation in a<br />
rainforest buffer without documented and approved plans.<br />
Minor<br />
Twenty-eight non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Minor were determined for <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes,<br />
including those related to inadequate ripping and retention of bark at landings; lack of noxious weed<br />
assessments and control; inadequate drainage of sections of roads, snig tracks and boundary tracks;<br />
instances of debris pushed or rolled into exclusion zones; and trees having been felled into buffers<br />
and pulled out without adequate documentation.<br />
Negligible<br />
A total of 49 non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of Negligible were determined during the audit,<br />
spread across most of the Compliance Elements. For <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes, these non-compliances<br />
included instances of litter found on coupes, lack of noxious weed assessments and control, a root ball<br />
having rolled into a habitat area, harvest debris having been pushed up around a designated habitat<br />
tree, failure to close roads and instances of inadequate drainage or rehabilitation of sections of roads,<br />
landings, snig tracks and boundary tracks,<br />
Two non-compliances identified for DSE coupes were determined as having Negligible EIA risk ratings<br />
related to incorrect location and marking of a filter on a temporary stream.<br />
No impact<br />
A total of 40 non-compliances with EIA risk ratings of No impact were determined during the audit,<br />
generally spread across Compliance Elements concerned with planning, but also related to failure to<br />
close roads no longer in use and undertake noxious weed assessments. For <strong>VicForests</strong> coupes,<br />
these non-compliances related to not having planned for noxious weed control, some waterways not<br />
having been classified, use of the wrong tape colour to delineate a buffer, failure to close roads no<br />
longer in use, and vegetation clearance widths not meeting minimum requirements,<br />
For the DSE coupes, non-compliances with No impact risk ratings included not having documented<br />
approvals to temporarily close roads during harvesting, not having assessed soil characteristics for<br />
one coupe, not having undertaken pre-harvest weed assessments and not having considered noxious<br />
weed control in coupe planning.<br />
34 42807504/01/01