12.01.2015 Views

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5.1 Overall assessment of compliance<br />

The audit included assessment of 27 coupes, including five fire salvage coupes and one thinnings<br />

coupe, selected to be representative of harvesting undertaken in the 2008-09 financial year, with the<br />

exception of domestic firewood coupes.<br />

Overall, the audit identified a high level of compliance across most Compliance Element groups, with<br />

moderate compliance in the Biodiversity Conservation group, mainly due to the absence of monitoring<br />

and control of noxious weeds.<br />

The Auditor noted a number of individual examples of good practice, including instances of:<br />

Conservative delineation of rainforest boundaries for ease of management;<br />

Particularly good examples of snig track rollover drains on a relatively steep slope;<br />

Reuse of existing landings and road alignments and effective use of natural outslope drainage<br />

where possible;<br />

Minimisation of vegetation clearance widths for road construction; and<br />

Minimisation of the area and impact of snig tracks.<br />

No non-compliances with Severe EIA risk rating were identified. Two non-compliances with an EIA<br />

risk rating of Major were identified, both being instances of machine entry into rainforest buffer and<br />

associated rainforest.<br />

The majority (59%) of non-compliances identified were determined as having EIA risk ratings of<br />

Negligible or No impact, with 49 of the total of 150 non-compliances being assessed as Negligible and<br />

40 assessed as No impact. Thirty-one Moderate and 28 Minor non-compliances were also identified,<br />

mainly in the following areas:<br />

One instance of soil stockpiling within a rainforest buffer for road rehabilitation without documented<br />

and approved plans;<br />

Insufficient topsoil and retention of excess bark at landings;<br />

Lack of noxious weed assessments and control;<br />

Inadequate or inappropriate drainage of sections of roads, snig tracks and boundary tracks;<br />

Inadequate management of cut and fill on some sections of roads;<br />

Instances of road construction on steeper slopes than prescribed for the soil type;<br />

Crossing of drainage lines without approval;<br />

Instances of debris pushed or rolled into exclusion zones;<br />

Inadequate evidence that authorisation was given to remove trees felled into buffers; and<br />

Instances of failure to classify streams adjacent to coupes.<br />

This audit report includes four recommendations for improvement where current systems are not<br />

considered adequate to meet the relevant audit criteria. They relate to weed control; fire salvage<br />

machinery cleaning protocols; closure of roads no longer needed; and disposal of excess bark when<br />

not undertaking regeneration burning. All recommendations apply to <strong>VicForests</strong> operations and two<br />

also apply<br />

to DSE.<br />

5.2 Risks to beneficial uses<br />

The audit did not identify any imminent environmental hazards or unacceptable risks to the beneficial<br />

uses listed in Section 2.3 of this report. The assessment of imminent environmental hazards was<br />

based on site observations and EIA risk rating assessments of identified non-compliances, using the<br />

42807504/01/01 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!