12.01.2015 Views

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 3BAudit Findings<br />

Non-compliances were recorded on five coupes (C2, C7, C20, C21 and C24) where small amounts of<br />

litter were observed, including discarded chainsaw chains, empty oil containers, a spray paint can,<br />

rags, glass and ropes. These non-compliances were assessed as having Negligible EIA risk ratings.<br />

The Auditor notes that additional litter was also observed at these and other coupes during the audit.<br />

The nature of the litter observed and its apparent recent deposition suggested that it was not the direct<br />

result of the timber harvesting activities. As such these observations were not recorded as noncompliances.<br />

Water catchments<br />

Water catchments were generally assessed as having been managed appropriately with regards to<br />

consideration of Special Area Plans and Heritage River Area management.<br />

Table 4-11 summarises the compliance findings for the River health, water quality and soil protection –<br />

Water catchments Compliance Element.<br />

Table 4-11 Summary of compliance findings for the River health, water quality and soil protection –<br />

Water catchments Compliance Element<br />

Compliance Element<br />

River Health, Water Quality and Soil<br />

Assessment - Water catchments<br />

Total compliance 34<br />

Total non-compliance 1<br />

Non-compliance EIA breakdown<br />

Severe 0<br />

Major 0<br />

Moderate 0<br />

Minor 0<br />

Negligible 0<br />

No impact 1<br />

One non-compliance was identified where coupe planning documents indicated that <strong>VicForests</strong> did not<br />

check whether any designated water catchment requirements applied during planning for one coupe<br />

(C21). The EIA risk rating was determined as No impact.<br />

The Water Catchments Compliance Element includes a criterion requiring compliance with the<br />

Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994, which requires landowners to take all reasonable steps to<br />

control noxious weeds. The declared noxious weeds recorded in the coupes included blackberry<br />

(Rubus fruticosus) and spear thistle (Cirsium vulgare). These weeds were observed at varying<br />

extents and densities across the audited coupes. Non-compliances were not recorded against this<br />

Compliance Element, as monitoring of noxious weeds is also a requirement of the Management<br />

Procedures, compliance with which is addressed by the Forest Health Compliance Element. The<br />

control of pests, including noxious weeds, is also assessed as a Code requirement under the<br />

Biodiversity conservation – Protection of biodiversity values Compliance Element. In order to avoid<br />

‘double-counting’ of compliances and non-compliances where the same requirement is addressed by<br />

more than one Compliance Element, these findings have been recorded against the Forest Health and<br />

42807504/01/01 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!