12.01.2015 Views

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

Module 5 - VicForests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 3BAudit Findings<br />

A non-compliance assessed as having a Moderate EIA risk rating was identified on one section of<br />

temporary road, where soil had been stockpiled for road rehabilitation within a rainforest buffer without<br />

documented and approved plans (C3). This issue is discussed further in the Road construction<br />

Compliance Element section of this report.<br />

A total length of 5,275 m of permanent road was assessed across 7 coupes, with 4,067 m assessed<br />

as compliant. The full sampled length of permanent road was assessed as compliant on four coupes<br />

with regard to drainage requirements and slope limitations, with portions of the remaining three roads<br />

(C9, C12 and C21) assessed as non-compliant. The non-compliances identified related to ineffective<br />

drainage structures, drainage structures exceeding the maximum specified spacing (C9, C12 and<br />

C21) and harvesting debris blocking table drains (C21).<br />

Results from soil assessments and classification undertaken by <strong>VicForests</strong> were assessed as aligning<br />

with or being more conservative than those undertaken by the Auditor in the majority of cases. Across<br />

25 coupes, <strong>VicForests</strong>’ assessment was more conservative in 14 cases for one or both of soil erosion<br />

hazard classification or soil permeability. In three instances, <strong>VicForests</strong>’ soil erosion hazard<br />

classification was assessed as incorrect, however, it did not affect the final Water Quality Risk rating,<br />

which is the measure used to determine buffer and filter widths. A summary of soil assessment<br />

results is attached as Appendix J.<br />

Further detail and compliance with requirements based on evidence other than field measurements<br />

are also described in the following sections.<br />

Compliance with a number of requirements were unable to be assessed in some instances during the<br />

audit based on field inspection or desktop review, due to the stage of the operational activities and<br />

availability of records. These requirements included:<br />

Whether the subgrade was adequately consolidated at the time pavement material was placed<br />

during road construction;<br />

Whether base course material was levelled prior to placement of a wearing course;<br />

Where significant fill is present on road batters, whether this was placed according to engineer<br />

approved methods;<br />

Whether table drains were created concurrent with road construction;<br />

Whether erosion and sedimentation control was ongoing over the duration of the construction<br />

activity;<br />

Whether quarry materials used were free of Cinnamon fungus (Phytophthora cinnamomi);<br />

Whether road construction materials were prevented from spilling into watercourses during<br />

construction; and<br />

Whether roads were temporarily closed to heavy timber harvesting traffic in persistent wet or dry<br />

weather or when there was a chance that the roads surface will deteriorate or water courses will be<br />

polluted.<br />

Road planning<br />

The majority of planning activities were assessed as having been implemented appropriately across<br />

the sampled coupes, including planning of the alignment and timing of construction to minimise risks<br />

to a range of environmental values in most instances; and the reuse of existing road alignments where<br />

possible.<br />

Table 4-18 summarises the compliance findings for the Road planning Compliance Element.<br />

42807504/01/01 39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!