15.01.2015 Views

Information Only - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Information Only - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Information Only - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This feature <strong>of</strong> the analysis will reappear when langbeinite results are presented<br />

below. Caution should be used when attempting to aggregate potash valuation data via<br />

summing E(PV) and E(NPV) figures. Rather, figures ,or a given area should be<br />

considered separately, but in light <strong>of</strong> data from other areas.<br />

<strong>Information</strong> <strong>Only</strong><br />

VIII-4<br />

Langbeinite:<br />

In the first mining scenario (mining height = 6 leet and mining recovery =<br />

60 %), if no new development costs are incurred, the E(NPV) <strong>of</strong> mining<br />

langbeinite in the combined area to a single firm is estimated at $42 million. In<br />

the second mining scenario (mining height = 6 feet and mining recovery = 80 %),<br />

if no new development costs are incurred, the E(NPV) (, mining laD"heinite in<br />

the combined area to a single firm is about $38 million " the thin: , lIning<br />

scenario (mining height = 4.5 feet and mining recovery = 90%), if no new<br />

development costs are incurred, the E(NPV) <strong>of</strong> mining langbeinite in the<br />

combined area to a single firm is about $53 million see Table 3. Langbenite<br />

E(NPV) data for the other two development scenarios and the three mining cases<br />

are presented in Tables 4 and 5.<br />

Simulation method<br />

Potash reserve estimates for the WIPP site, additional area, and combined area<br />

were provided by consultants and specialists at the New Mexico Bureau <strong>of</strong> Mines &<br />

Mineral Resources. A simulation model was constructed cor bC" notash and langbeinite<br />

in each <strong>of</strong> the three areas <strong>of</strong> interest that incorporated the miniE" eases (langbeinite) and<br />

development scenarios (no capital investment, $5 million invested, or new plant<br />

construction). Key model inputs, in addition to reserve data, included the price <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commodity, the unit cost <strong>of</strong> extraction, severance-tax rates, state and federal corporate<br />

taxes, the depreciation schedule assumed for capital investments, and the discount rate.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> a method to anticipate future market prices for potash was a key issue,<br />

Time units were years, and the time frame simulated was 1995-2030.<br />

Forecasting is as much an inexact an as a science, panicularly when the<br />

forecasting horizon is 35 years. Although historical prices for Eddy County potash were<br />

modeled using time-series methods, a simulation approach was used to value these<br />

resources. Annual market prices were simulated using a random-walk methodology (an<br />

excellent reference is Karlin and Taylor, 1975), which is discussed below. Depletion was<br />

calculated using the standard methodology, which may be found in Stermole and Stermole<br />

(1993).<br />

The time frame considered was 1995-2030. Market prices and extraction and<br />

maintenance costs were considered on an annual basis. A sample (this sample does not<br />

include actual data used in the study for both market prices and operating costs)<br />

simulation run for the years 1995-2000 is provided in Table 1.<br />

Key assumptions and features associated with the oil and gas cash flows used in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!