15.01.2015 Views

Information Only - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Information Only - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Information Only - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1994). The productivity <strong>of</strong> a fractured horizontal well is many times higher than :.'Jat <strong>of</strong> a<br />

non-fractured horizontal well, which in rum is many times higher than that <strong>of</strong> a 'ertical<br />

well. The benefit <strong>of</strong> hydraulic fracturin; must be carefully evaluated against the gain in<br />

productivity using simulators. The simulator is developed to predict the ultimate revenue<br />

rerum.<br />

Hydraulic fracturing will be used increasingly to make wells more economic and<br />

increase productivity. TheJas Research Institute predicts that hydraulic fracturing and/or<br />

horizontal wells will be" most attractive methods for developing marginally economic<br />

reservoirs as well as increasing productiVity <strong>of</strong> tight gas sands and multizone reservoirs<br />

(GR!, 1992).<br />

In situ stress pr<strong>of</strong>iling<br />

Strong emphasis over the past decade has been on evaluating in-situ rock stresses<br />

before performing a hydraulic-fracturing job (Gidley, 1989). This is because the<br />

hydraulic-fracturing pararneters obtained from a fracturing job are especially sensitive to<br />

the minimum principal in-situ stress pr<strong>of</strong>Ile. The design and simulation <strong>of</strong> a hydrauiic<br />

fracture requires correct information about the fonnation u, situ stresses and rock<br />

properties. Therefore, emphasis has been on obtaining an accurate minimum in-siru stress<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>Ile for the least amount <strong>of</strong> money.<br />

It has teen shown over the past decade L1at the method with the least number <strong>of</strong><br />

problems in ootaining the correct minimum principal in-situ stress pr<strong>of</strong>Ile is direct<br />

measurement using small-volume hydraulic fractures. These are expensive and may not<br />

be compatible with the well completion scheme, particularlv if measurements are made in<br />

layers above the pay zone. Many techniques exist for eVL,:.ting in-situ stress ar.:epth.<br />

All have been investigated in the past decade. but they suffer from various disaavantages.<br />

Core-based methods, including anelastic strain recovery. differential strain-curve analysis,<br />

shear acoustic anisotropy. acoustic emissions, etc.• all requite the taking <strong>of</strong> core followed<br />

by detailed analysis. Furthermore, problems with core quality, rock fabric, etc., may<br />

degrade the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the stress estimate. Methods <strong>of</strong> using sonic log or drilling data<br />

may give correct results in some instances but are not always reliable (Harikrishhnan,<br />

1995).<br />

A recent study demonstrated that knowledge <strong>of</strong> the in-situ stress pr<strong>of</strong>ile is essential<br />

in designing and optimizing the hydraulic-fracturing design (GR!. 1992). The usage <strong>of</strong><br />

correct minimum principal in-situ streSS pr<strong>of</strong>ile bas shown productivity to improve<br />

markedly over jobs designed without detailed in-situ stress information.<br />

In the future, knowledge <strong>of</strong> in-situ stresses will be essential for any economic<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> a hydraulic fracturing job. Therefore. new. accurate, and inexpensive<br />

methods will need to be investigated to obtain in-situ stresses using either logs. drilling<br />

data, core analysis, or new tools.<br />

X-ll<br />

<strong>Information</strong> <strong>Only</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!