16.01.2015 Views

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physiological basis of salt tolerance in rice<br />

with reference to coastal saline ecosystem<br />

Physiological basis of salt tolerance was studied in<br />

eight landraces from Odisha and West Bengal found<br />

tolerant in earlier studies. After 10 days of salt stress<br />

(EC <strong>12</strong> dS m -1 ), Kamini with 90% plant survival was<br />

comparable to Pokkali and Saltol donor FL478. The three<br />

cultivars survived under salt stress for 16 days while<br />

the remaining entries died completely between 10 and<br />

16 days. Salinity significantly reduced the area and<br />

fresh weight of the 2 nd top most leaf seven days after<br />

stress in all the genotypes, but the reduction over the<br />

control was lowest (22.0 & 30.7%) in Kamini and highest<br />

(71.8% & 71.2%) in IR29. In FL478, the corresponding<br />

reduction in the leaf area and leaf weight was 41.1%<br />

and 44.5%, respectively. Total chlorophyll content per<br />

unit leaf area in 2 nd leaf at seven days after the stress<br />

increased under salinity for all the genotypes, except<br />

Marisal. The increase was lowest in IR29 and highest<br />

in Ravana followed by Kamini. The increase in chlorophyll<br />

content was generally due to an increase in chlorophyll<br />

b content. Total dry matter production at seven<br />

days after salt stress was also lowered by salinity in all<br />

the genotypes, but again the reduction was lowest<br />

(24.5%) in Kamini and highest (56.6%) in IR 29. Distribution<br />

of dry matter in different plant parts (root, leaf<br />

and stem) was also affected by salt stress and the response<br />

varied with the genotypes. While Kamini and<br />

IR29 showed similar reduction in root dry matter, reduction<br />

in leaf and stem dry matter was relatively much<br />

lower for Kamini. As a result, shoot:root ratio in salt<br />

stress treatment was significantly increased in Kamini<br />

but decreased in IR29. For the remaining genotypes,<br />

shoot: root ratio was either maintained to the same level<br />

as in the control or decreased. After seven days of salt<br />

stress, tolerant genotypes recorded significantly higher<br />

K content in leaf (22.7-27.9 mg g -1 dry weight) and stem<br />

(15.2-29.9 mg g -1 dry weight) compared to IR29 (18.5 &<br />

11.1 mg g -1 dry weight) while reverse was true for Na<br />

content. The Na content in leaf and stem was 24.9 and<br />

31.0 mg/g dry weight for IR29, as against 11.3-21.5 and<br />

19.7-27.9 mg g -1 dry weight for the remaining cultivars.<br />

The Na:K ratio in leaf and stem was much higher in<br />

IR29 (1.35 & 2.79) than in tolerant varieties (0.44-1.02 &<br />

0.66-1.80). Among the tolerant cultivars, Marisal and<br />

Talmugra recorded higher Na:K ratio both in leaf and<br />

stem.<br />

Identification of rice varieties tolerant to<br />

different growth stage drought stress<br />

Seedling stage<br />

Thirty two entries out of 100 genotypes for seedling<br />

stage drought stress recorded SES score ‘1’ at Soil Moisture<br />

Content (SMC) 10-<strong>12</strong>%, while under severe stress<br />

(SMC 1.2-2.0 %), nine entries IC568024, IC-568009,<br />

IC568114, IC568060, IC568016, IC568030, IC568083,<br />

IC5681<strong>12</strong> and IC568065 survived having more than 50%<br />

RWC and recovered fast after re-irrigation.<br />

Vegetative stage<br />

Two hundred eighty seven entries out of 970 genotypes<br />

for vegetative stage drought stress recorded SES<br />

score ‘1’ at SMC <strong>12</strong>-14%. Promising entries R-RF-45<br />

(1.79 t ha -1 ), IR72667-16-1-B-B-3 (1.56 t ha -1 ), IR84882-<br />

B-<strong>12</strong>0-CRA-1-1-1 (1.51 t ha -1 ); CB5-754 (3.5 t ha -1 ), Lalat<br />

(3.20 t ha -1 ) and IR83388-B-B-108-3 (2.80 t ha -1 ); IR83614-<br />

643-B (2.90 t ha -1 ) and IR36 (2.60 t ha -1 ) under vegetative<br />

stage stress recorded higher grain yield compared<br />

to other entries.<br />

Reproductive stage<br />

Thirty four entries out of 56 genotypes for reproductive<br />

stage stress were observed to be tolerant with SES<br />

score’1’. Under reproductive stage stress (10 days before<br />

flowering to 10 days after flowering), RR345-2 recorded<br />

highest grain yield of 2.50 t ha -1 followed by<br />

RR2-6 (2.30 t ha -1 ), CR143-2-2 (1.80 t ha -1 ) and IET 18817<br />

(1.15 t ha -1 ) with high moisture retention capacity (><br />

80%) and low DSI (drought susceptibility index) values<br />

(about 0.60) with high grain filling percentage<br />

(>70%).<br />

Evaluation of drought tolerant genotypes for<br />

yield potential under control and rainfed<br />

upland condition (along with AICRIP entries)<br />

Forty entries including 14 entries from AICRIP were<br />

evaluated under rainfed upland condition at KVK,<br />

Santhpur and controlled irrigated condition at CRRI,<br />

Cuttack for their yield potential. The crop experienced<br />

two mild stresses of six days duration in seedling stage<br />

and of 15 days duration during reproductive stage (54<br />

days old seedling) at KVK Santhpur. Out of 40 entries<br />

tested, RR 270-5, RR345-2, Kalakeri and IET 18717, IET<br />

20859, IET 21620, IET 21627, IET 22020, IET 22051, IET<br />

22026, Anjali and Sahabhagidhan had yield potential<br />

of more than 4.0 t ha -1 under controlled irrigated condition<br />

at CRRI farm, while RR383-2, RR 2-6, CR143-2-2,<br />

Zhu11-16, RR443-2, IET 21620, IET 22026, IET 22032,<br />

Kalakeri and Sahabhagidhan had yield potential of ><br />

1.50 t ha -1 with > 50% grain filling percentage under<br />

rainfed condition even after getting exposed to stress at<br />

both the stages.<br />

Physiological basis of drought stress tolerance<br />

Six rice varieties viz., Bala, Peta, Dular, Mahsuri,<br />

Safri17 and IR20 grown in pots were exposed to veg-<br />

46 CRRI ANNUAL REPORT 2011-<strong>12</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!