16.01.2015 Views

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Developing IPM Technologies for Different <strong>Rice</strong> Ecologies<br />

Developing IPM Technologies<br />

for Different <strong>Rice</strong> Ecologies<br />

Studies on Components of IPM<br />

Control of field pests by chemicals and its long<br />

term effect in rice environment<br />

Long term pesticide trial<br />

Four formulations of pesticides viz., Cartap @ 1 kg.<br />

a.i. ha -1 @, Chlorpyrifos @ 0.5 kg a.i. ha -1 , Carbendazim<br />

@ 1%, and Pretilachor @ 0.75 kg. a.i. ha -1 along with<br />

untreated control were screened against insect pests of<br />

rice during dry season, 2011. Result of the experiment<br />

revealed that Cartap (Critap 4G) treatment recorded<br />

lowest percentage (4.05%) of dead heart (DH), white<br />

ear head (WEH)(4.0%), gundhi bug damage (9.25%),<br />

leaf folder (LF) damage (3.<strong>12</strong>%) and highest grain yield<br />

of 5.73 t ha -1 in variety Naveen followed by Chlorpyrifos<br />

(Suban 1.5% dust).<br />

Result of the experiment during wet season, 2011<br />

also revealed that Cartap treatment recorded lowest<br />

percentage of DH (3.87%),WEH (3.62%), gundhi bug<br />

damage (8.75%), LF damage (3.0%) and highest grain<br />

yield of 5.25 t ha -1 in variety Naveen followed by<br />

Chlorpyrifos. All other insecticides were found effective<br />

against yellow stem borer, LF and gundhi bug.<br />

(Table 34). Spider population was highly affected by<br />

the application of Pretilachlor (0.5 spider sweep -1 ) as<br />

compared to control (3.0 spiders sweep -1 ).<br />

Root knot nematode was reduced by 84.3% in Cartap<br />

treated plots followed by Chlorpyrifos (81.6%) whereas,<br />

rice root nematode was reduced by 69% in Chlorpyrifos<br />

treated plots followed by Cartap treated plots (66.3%)<br />

compared to control.<br />

Enumeration of microbial population during wet<br />

season, 2011 indicated that plots treated with Cartap<br />

showed ~20% inhibitory effect to copiotrophs and ~5-<br />

10 % to other microbial population with respect to control.<br />

Other pesticides viz., Chlorpyrifos, Bavistin and<br />

the herbicide Pretilachlor did not affect more than ~5%<br />

microbial population.<br />

Testing of new insecticides against insect pests<br />

Eleven of insecticide formulations viz., Imidacloprid<br />

17.8% @ 300g ha -1 , Sulfoxaflor 24% @375g ha -1 ,<br />

Sulfoxaflor 24% @313 g ha -1 , Thiamethoxam 25%@100g<br />

ha -1 , Applaud (Buprofezin) 25% @ 700ml ha -1 , Acephate<br />

95% SG @ 592 ml ha -1 , Dinotefuron 20% @ 200 ml ha -<br />

Table 34. Long term effect of pesticides on insect pest of rice during dry and wet season, 2011<br />

% Gundhi % Gundhi<br />

bug bug Yield Yield<br />

%DH %DH %WEH %WEH %LF %LF damage damage ha -1 ha -1<br />

Treatment with % dry wet dry wet dry wet dry wet dry wet<br />

a.i. and dose g ha -1 season season season season season season season season season season<br />

Cartap@1kg a.i. ha -1 4.05 3.87 4.00 3.62 3.<strong>12</strong> 3.00 9.25 8.75<br />

(11.60) (11.35) (11.52) (10.97) (10.15) (9.95) (17.69) (17.19) 5.73 5.25<br />

Chlorpyrifos 4.72 4.<strong>12</strong> 4.75 4.00 4.00 3.70 9.95 10.<strong>12</strong><br />

@0.5kg a.i. ha -1 (<strong>12</strong>.54) (11.71) (<strong>12</strong>.58) (11.53) (11.52) (11.08) (18.38) (18.55) 5.42 5.20<br />

Carbendazim @0.1% 7.27 6.35 7.15 6.30 6.<strong>12</strong> 5.65 13.0 <strong>12</strong>.87<br />

(15.64) (14.59) (15.50) (14.53) (14.32) (13.74) (21.13) (21.02) 5.31 4.88<br />

Pretilachlor 7.37 6.50 7.25 6.67 6.50 6.10 13.95 13.30<br />

@0.75kg a.i. ha -1 (15.75) (14.72) (15.61) (14.97) (14.76) (14.30) (21.93) (21.38) 5.21 4.53<br />

Control 8.32 8.00 8.27 7.90 7.50 7.97 15.42 14.87<br />

(16.76) (16.42) (16.71) (16.32) (15.88) (16.39) (23.11) (22.68) 4.53 4.26<br />

CD (P=0.05) 0.67 0.39 0.47 0.31 0.83 0.55 0.75 0.76 0.81 0.72<br />

CRRI ANNUAL REPORT 2011-<strong>12</strong><br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!