Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12
Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12
Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Developing IPM Technologies for Different <strong>Rice</strong> Ecologies<br />
Developing IPM Technologies<br />
for Different <strong>Rice</strong> Ecologies<br />
Studies on Components of IPM<br />
Control of field pests by chemicals and its long<br />
term effect in rice environment<br />
Long term pesticide trial<br />
Four formulations of pesticides viz., Cartap @ 1 kg.<br />
a.i. ha -1 @, Chlorpyrifos @ 0.5 kg a.i. ha -1 , Carbendazim<br />
@ 1%, and Pretilachor @ 0.75 kg. a.i. ha -1 along with<br />
untreated control were screened against insect pests of<br />
rice during dry season, 2011. Result of the experiment<br />
revealed that Cartap (Critap 4G) treatment recorded<br />
lowest percentage (4.05%) of dead heart (DH), white<br />
ear head (WEH)(4.0%), gundhi bug damage (9.25%),<br />
leaf folder (LF) damage (3.<strong>12</strong>%) and highest grain yield<br />
of 5.73 t ha -1 in variety Naveen followed by Chlorpyrifos<br />
(Suban 1.5% dust).<br />
Result of the experiment during wet season, 2011<br />
also revealed that Cartap treatment recorded lowest<br />
percentage of DH (3.87%),WEH (3.62%), gundhi bug<br />
damage (8.75%), LF damage (3.0%) and highest grain<br />
yield of 5.25 t ha -1 in variety Naveen followed by<br />
Chlorpyrifos. All other insecticides were found effective<br />
against yellow stem borer, LF and gundhi bug.<br />
(Table 34). Spider population was highly affected by<br />
the application of Pretilachlor (0.5 spider sweep -1 ) as<br />
compared to control (3.0 spiders sweep -1 ).<br />
Root knot nematode was reduced by 84.3% in Cartap<br />
treated plots followed by Chlorpyrifos (81.6%) whereas,<br />
rice root nematode was reduced by 69% in Chlorpyrifos<br />
treated plots followed by Cartap treated plots (66.3%)<br />
compared to control.<br />
Enumeration of microbial population during wet<br />
season, 2011 indicated that plots treated with Cartap<br />
showed ~20% inhibitory effect to copiotrophs and ~5-<br />
10 % to other microbial population with respect to control.<br />
Other pesticides viz., Chlorpyrifos, Bavistin and<br />
the herbicide Pretilachlor did not affect more than ~5%<br />
microbial population.<br />
Testing of new insecticides against insect pests<br />
Eleven of insecticide formulations viz., Imidacloprid<br />
17.8% @ 300g ha -1 , Sulfoxaflor 24% @375g ha -1 ,<br />
Sulfoxaflor 24% @313 g ha -1 , Thiamethoxam 25%@100g<br />
ha -1 , Applaud (Buprofezin) 25% @ 700ml ha -1 , Acephate<br />
95% SG @ 592 ml ha -1 , Dinotefuron 20% @ 200 ml ha -<br />
Table 34. Long term effect of pesticides on insect pest of rice during dry and wet season, 2011<br />
% Gundhi % Gundhi<br />
bug bug Yield Yield<br />
%DH %DH %WEH %WEH %LF %LF damage damage ha -1 ha -1<br />
Treatment with % dry wet dry wet dry wet dry wet dry wet<br />
a.i. and dose g ha -1 season season season season season season season season season season<br />
Cartap@1kg a.i. ha -1 4.05 3.87 4.00 3.62 3.<strong>12</strong> 3.00 9.25 8.75<br />
(11.60) (11.35) (11.52) (10.97) (10.15) (9.95) (17.69) (17.19) 5.73 5.25<br />
Chlorpyrifos 4.72 4.<strong>12</strong> 4.75 4.00 4.00 3.70 9.95 10.<strong>12</strong><br />
@0.5kg a.i. ha -1 (<strong>12</strong>.54) (11.71) (<strong>12</strong>.58) (11.53) (11.52) (11.08) (18.38) (18.55) 5.42 5.20<br />
Carbendazim @0.1% 7.27 6.35 7.15 6.30 6.<strong>12</strong> 5.65 13.0 <strong>12</strong>.87<br />
(15.64) (14.59) (15.50) (14.53) (14.32) (13.74) (21.13) (21.02) 5.31 4.88<br />
Pretilachlor 7.37 6.50 7.25 6.67 6.50 6.10 13.95 13.30<br />
@0.75kg a.i. ha -1 (15.75) (14.72) (15.61) (14.97) (14.76) (14.30) (21.93) (21.38) 5.21 4.53<br />
Control 8.32 8.00 8.27 7.90 7.50 7.97 15.42 14.87<br />
(16.76) (16.42) (16.71) (16.32) (15.88) (16.39) (23.11) (22.68) 4.53 4.26<br />
CD (P=0.05) 0.67 0.39 0.47 0.31 0.83 0.55 0.75 0.76 0.81 0.72<br />
CRRI ANNUAL REPORT 2011-<strong>12</strong><br />
83