16.01.2015 Views

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

Central Rice Research Institute Annual report...2011-12

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enhancing and Sustaining the Productivity of <strong>Rice</strong> Based Farming Systems<br />

Long term–assessment of<br />

soil quality and resilience<br />

in rice-rice system<br />

The long term effect of nutrient<br />

management practices on soil<br />

physical, chemical and biological<br />

properties was studied for<br />

proper interpretation of the yield<br />

changes and development of soil<br />

quality indices. Keeping this, in<br />

view after 41 years of rice-rice<br />

system, the detailed soil analysis<br />

was conducted to find out the<br />

effects of nutrient management<br />

practices on soil properties in a<br />

subtropical rice–rice system.To<br />

determine a soil quality index,<br />

sustainable yield index was<br />

taken as the goal. The minimum<br />

data set (MDS) of indicators that<br />

best represent soil function were<br />

selected and scoring of MDS indicators<br />

based on their performance<br />

of soil function was done.<br />

Finally indicator scores were integrated<br />

into a comparative index of soil quality. The<br />

value of the dimensionless soil quality index varied<br />

from 1.46 in control plot to 3.50 in NPK +FYM plot. Six<br />

soil quality indicators such as DTPA Zn, SOC, available<br />

N, CDI, DHA and available K contributed 21.4,<br />

20.4, 18.0, 19.5, 16.6 and 4.1% to the soil quality index<br />

estimation, respectively under NPK +FYM treated plot<br />

(Fig. 21). By considering NPK+FYM as an ideal treatment,<br />

the relative soil quality explained that if there<br />

were exclusion of FYM, the soil quality would decline<br />

by 31.4%; similarly if no manure and fertilizers were<br />

applied, the soil quality would decline by 61.4%. Similarly<br />

when compared with NPK treatment, soil quality<br />

declined by 47.3, 35.8, 5.7 and 14.0% in control, N, NP<br />

and NK treatments. This indicated that N and FYM are<br />

the important interventions which maintain and improve<br />

the soil quality.<br />

Management of Problem Soils<br />

Management of coastal saline soils<br />

Soil samples were collected during post monsoon<br />

period from Ersama block, Jagatsingpur district of<br />

Odisha during 2011-<strong>12</strong> in a grid size of 4 km x 4 km.<br />

The soil pH, EC (1:2), available N, Available P, avail-<br />

Fig. 21. Relative contribution of soil quality indicators to the soil quality<br />

index of long term rice–rice soil under different nutrient management<br />

systems<br />

able K and micronutrients were determined. Crop cutting<br />

experiments were conducted in wet season at some<br />

places proximity to the grid point to determine the yield<br />

of rice under N applied and no N applied plots, the<br />

grid points where crop cutting was not possible secondary<br />

data from the farmers were collected. Taking<br />

the soil properties, salinity status and historical data<br />

i.e. waterlogged and non waterlogged conditions; the<br />

agronomic N use efficiency was assigned for each grid<br />

points. The site specific fertilizer N (SSFN) required was<br />

calculated using the formulae SSFN = (Y Target<br />

– Y 0<br />

N)/<br />

AEN, Y Target<br />

= Yield target, Y 0<br />

N = N-limited yield, AEN<br />

= Expected plot grain yield increase per unit of fertilizer<br />

N applied. The data of soil EC and site specific<br />

fertilizer N required were subjected to analysis of classical<br />

statistics and the data fitted well to normal distribution.<br />

The EC value ranged from 0.25 dSm -1 to 6.04<br />

dSm -1 with average value of 1.43 dSm -1 . The SSFN ranged<br />

from 66-100 kg ha -1 with an average of 80 kg ha -1 . Using<br />

appropriate semivariograms, the EC (1:2) and SSFN<br />

value were interpolated by kriging with the given grid<br />

size; the map generated (Fig. 22) provided the regions<br />

and loops of EC and with distinct values and explains<br />

the quality and heterogeneity in the region.<br />

CRRI ANNUAL REPORT 2011-<strong>12</strong><br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!