Council Minutes 16 April 2007 - Waratah-Wynyard Council
Council Minutes 16 April 2007 - Waratah-Wynyard Council
Council Minutes 16 April 2007 - Waratah-Wynyard Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Planning Authority Reports<br />
The developer, following initial assessment of the proposal by <strong>Council</strong> staff<br />
with input from DPIW officer Mr Martin Huzzey, has submitted supporting<br />
documentation from Tasmanian Fire Services, Mr Malcolm Densley and Mr<br />
Chris Bartlett. The issues of concern identified when assessing the application<br />
against the requirements of LUPAA and the responses provided by the<br />
developer in the supporting information are set out below:<br />
Issues relevant to LUPAA<br />
requirements under Section 56.<br />
Minor amendments of permits<br />
(c) does not change the use or<br />
development for which the permit was<br />
issued other than a minor change to<br />
the description of the use or<br />
development<br />
Comment<br />
The proposed inclusion of lots 25 to<br />
30 into Stage three does not represent<br />
a significant departure from the<br />
original permit in itself however when<br />
coupled with the retention of the farm<br />
dam raises concerns as these lots abut<br />
the dam.<br />
The retention of the dam on Lot 36<br />
does represent a significant departure<br />
from the original approval. Any<br />
draining works require a permit from<br />
DPIW and would include conditions<br />
to rehabilitate the land. Thus Lot 36<br />
under the original permit would have<br />
resulted in a usable lot of<br />
approximately 3 Hectares absent the<br />
need to maintain the 10 Megalitre,<br />
(Ref Densley Report) farm dam. To<br />
allow the 10 Megalitre dam to remain<br />
and significantly restrict the useable<br />
land on lot 36 is not viewed as a<br />
minor alteration to the original<br />
approval.<br />
The effect on lot 36 if the developer’s<br />
arguments are accepted, in respect to<br />
waterway values is to severely restrict<br />
the development potential of the lot<br />
due to setbacks required under the<br />
Scheme with particular reference to<br />
the Wetlands and Waterways<br />
Schedule.<br />
This schedule provides a 30-metre<br />
setback requirement for works under<br />
the Acceptable Solution. It is<br />
<strong>Waratah</strong>-<strong>Wynyard</strong> <strong>Council</strong> – Ordinary Meeting <strong>Minutes</strong> – <strong>16</strong> <strong>April</strong> <strong>2007</strong> Page 29