20.01.2015 Views

Council Minutes 16 April 2007 - Waratah-Wynyard Council

Council Minutes 16 April 2007 - Waratah-Wynyard Council

Council Minutes 16 April 2007 - Waratah-Wynyard Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planning Authority Reports<br />

The developer, following initial assessment of the proposal by <strong>Council</strong> staff<br />

with input from DPIW officer Mr Martin Huzzey, has submitted supporting<br />

documentation from Tasmanian Fire Services, Mr Malcolm Densley and Mr<br />

Chris Bartlett. The issues of concern identified when assessing the application<br />

against the requirements of LUPAA and the responses provided by the<br />

developer in the supporting information are set out below:<br />

Issues relevant to LUPAA<br />

requirements under Section 56.<br />

Minor amendments of permits<br />

(c) does not change the use or<br />

development for which the permit was<br />

issued other than a minor change to<br />

the description of the use or<br />

development<br />

Comment<br />

The proposed inclusion of lots 25 to<br />

30 into Stage three does not represent<br />

a significant departure from the<br />

original permit in itself however when<br />

coupled with the retention of the farm<br />

dam raises concerns as these lots abut<br />

the dam.<br />

The retention of the dam on Lot 36<br />

does represent a significant departure<br />

from the original approval. Any<br />

draining works require a permit from<br />

DPIW and would include conditions<br />

to rehabilitate the land. Thus Lot 36<br />

under the original permit would have<br />

resulted in a usable lot of<br />

approximately 3 Hectares absent the<br />

need to maintain the 10 Megalitre,<br />

(Ref Densley Report) farm dam. To<br />

allow the 10 Megalitre dam to remain<br />

and significantly restrict the useable<br />

land on lot 36 is not viewed as a<br />

minor alteration to the original<br />

approval.<br />

The effect on lot 36 if the developer’s<br />

arguments are accepted, in respect to<br />

waterway values is to severely restrict<br />

the development potential of the lot<br />

due to setbacks required under the<br />

Scheme with particular reference to<br />

the Wetlands and Waterways<br />

Schedule.<br />

This schedule provides a 30-metre<br />

setback requirement for works under<br />

the Acceptable Solution. It is<br />

<strong>Waratah</strong>-<strong>Wynyard</strong> <strong>Council</strong> – Ordinary Meeting <strong>Minutes</strong> – <strong>16</strong> <strong>April</strong> <strong>2007</strong> Page 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!