Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Our specialty insurance business produced modestly proÑtable underwriting results in <strong>2005</strong><br />
compared with unproÑtable results in 2004 and 2003. The combined loss and expense ratios for the<br />
classes <strong>of</strong> business within specialty insurance were as follows:<br />
Years Ended December 31<br />
<strong>2005</strong> 2004 2003<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional liability ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ 99.8% 112.0% 108.4%<br />
Surety ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ 62.9 57.2 39.0<br />
Total specialty ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ 97.3% 108.2% 103.9%<br />
Our pr<strong>of</strong>essional liability business improved substantially in <strong>2005</strong>, producing near breakeven<br />
results compared with the highly unproÑtable results in 2004 and 2003. Results have begun to beneÑt<br />
from the cumulative eÅect <strong>of</strong> price increases, lower policy limits and better terms and conditions in<br />
recent years. Results in all three years, but more so in 2004 and 2003, were adversely aÅected by<br />
unfavorable loss development related to accident years 2002 and prior, particularly in the errors and<br />
omissions class. The adverse development was predominantly from claims that have arisen due to<br />
corporate failures and allegations <strong>of</strong> management misconduct and accounting irregularities. Results<br />
were particularly unproÑtable in 2004 due to an increase <strong>of</strong> about $160 million in errors and omissions<br />
liability loss reserves in the second quarter related to investment banks. The Ñdelity component <strong>of</strong> our<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional liability business was highly proÑtable in each <strong>of</strong> the past three years due to favorable loss<br />
experience.<br />
Our surety business produced highly proÑtable results in each <strong>of</strong> the past three years due to<br />
favorable loss experience.<br />
Our surety business tends to be characterized by infrequent but potentially high severity losses.<br />
We continue to manage our exposure on an absolute basis and by speciÑc bond type. The majority <strong>of</strong><br />
our obligations are intended to be performance-based guarantees. When losses occur, they are<br />
mitigated, at times, by the customer's balance sheet, contract proceeds, collateral and bankruptcy<br />
recovery.<br />
We continue to have substantial commercial and construction surety exposure for current and<br />
prior customers. In that regard, we have exposures related to surety bonds issued on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />
companies that have experienced deterioration in creditworthiness since we issued bonds to them. We<br />
therefore may experience an increase in Ñled claims and may incur high severity losses. Such losses<br />
would be recognized if and when claims are Ñled and determined to be valid, and could have a material<br />
adverse eÅect on the Corporation's results <strong>of</strong> operations and liquidity.<br />
Reinsurance Assumed<br />
Our reinsurance assumed business is treaty reinsurance, primarily casualty reinsurance. Premiums<br />
from our reinsurance assumed business, which represented 7% <strong>of</strong> our net premiums written in <strong>2005</strong>,<br />
decreased by 21% in <strong>2005</strong> compared with a 16% increase in 2004. Premiums in <strong>2005</strong> included net<br />
reinsurance reinstatement premium revenue <strong>of</strong> $43 million related to Hurricane Katrina. The signiÑcant<br />
decrease in premiums in <strong>2005</strong> was in line with our expectations as we had anticipated fewer<br />
attractive opportunities in the reinsurance market.<br />
Our reinsurance assumed business was proÑtable in <strong>2005</strong>, 2004 and 2003. The combined loss and<br />
expense ratio for this business was 96.1%, 94.3% and 93.6% in <strong>2005</strong>, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> catastrophes accounted for 5.2 percentage points <strong>of</strong> the combined loss and expense ratio in<br />
<strong>2005</strong> and 2.2 percentage points in 2004. Catastrophe losses were not signiÑcant in 2003.<br />
34