Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
variety <strong>of</strong> factors. Second, diÅerent courts have addressed liability and coverage issues regarding<br />
pollution claims and have reached inconsistent conclusions in their interpretation <strong>of</strong> several issues.<br />
These signiÑcant uncertainties are not likely to be resolved deÑnitively in the near future.<br />
Uncertainties also remain as to the Superfund law itself. Superfund's taxing authority expired on<br />
December 31, 1995 and has not been re-enacted. Federal legislation appears to be at a standstill. At this<br />
time, it is not possible to predict the direction that any reforms may take, when they may occur or the<br />
eÅect that any changes may have on the insurance industry.<br />
Without federal movement on Superfund reform, the enforcement <strong>of</strong> Superfund liability is<br />
shifting to the states. States are being forced to reconsider state-level cleanup statutes and regulations.<br />
As individual states move forward, the potential for conÖicting state regulation becomes greater. In a<br />
few states, we are seeing cases brought against insureds or directly against insurance companies for<br />
environmental pollution and natural resources damages. To date, only a few natural resource claims<br />
have been Ñled and they are being vigorously defended. SigniÑcant uncertainty remains as to the cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> remediating the state sites. Because <strong>of</strong> the large number <strong>of</strong> state sites, such sites could prove even<br />
more costly in the aggregate than Superfund sites.<br />
In establishing our toxic waste reserves, we evaluate the exposure presented by each insured. As<br />
part <strong>of</strong> this evaluation, we consider a variety <strong>of</strong> factors including: the probable liability, available<br />
insurance coverage, judicial interpretations, past settlement values <strong>of</strong> similar exposures as well as facts<br />
that are unique to each insured.<br />
Uncertainty remains as to our ultimate liability relating to toxic waste claims. However, toxic<br />
waste losses appear to be developing as expected due to relatively stable claim trends. In many cases,<br />
claims are being settled for less than initially anticipated due to more eÇcient site remediation eÅorts.<br />
In other cases, we have been successful at buying back our policies.<br />
The following table presents a reconciliation <strong>of</strong> our beginning and ending loss reserves, net <strong>of</strong><br />
reinsurance recoverable, related to toxic waste claims. There are virtually no reinsurance recoveries<br />
related to these claims.<br />
Years Ended December 31<br />
<strong>2005</strong> 2004 2003<br />
(in millions)<br />
Reserves, beginning <strong>of</strong> yearÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ $208 $226 $249<br />
Incurred losses ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ Ì Ì Ì<br />
Losses paid ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ 17 18 23<br />
Reserves, end <strong>of</strong> year ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ $191 $208 $226<br />
Of the net toxic waste loss reserves at December 31, <strong>2005</strong> $64 million was for IBNR losses.<br />
Reinsurance Recoverable. Reinsurance recoverable is the estimated amount recoverable from<br />
reinsurers related to the losses we have incurred. At December 31, <strong>2005</strong>, reinsurance recoverable<br />
included $396 million recoverable with respect to paid losses and loss expenses, which is included in<br />
other assets, and $3.8 billion recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses.<br />
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses represents an estimate <strong>of</strong> the portion<br />
<strong>of</strong> our gross loss reserves that will be recovered from reinsurers. Such reinsurance recoverable is<br />
estimated as part <strong>of</strong> our loss reserving process using assumptions that are consistent with the<br />
assumptions used in estimating the gross loss reserves. Consequently, the estimation <strong>of</strong> reinsurance<br />
recoverable is subject to similar judgments and uncertainties as the estimation <strong>of</strong> gross loss reserves.<br />
Ceded reinsurance contracts do not relieve our primary obligation to our policyholders. Consequently,<br />
an exposure exists with respect to reinsurance recoverable to the extent that any reinsurer is<br />
unable or unwilling to meet the obligations assumed under the reinsurance contracts. We are selective<br />
in regard to our reinsurers, placing reinsurance with only those reinsurers with strong<br />
45