21.01.2015 Views

Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies

Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies

Annual Report 2005 - Chubb Group of Insurance Companies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

variety <strong>of</strong> factors. Second, diÅerent courts have addressed liability and coverage issues regarding<br />

pollution claims and have reached inconsistent conclusions in their interpretation <strong>of</strong> several issues.<br />

These signiÑcant uncertainties are not likely to be resolved deÑnitively in the near future.<br />

Uncertainties also remain as to the Superfund law itself. Superfund's taxing authority expired on<br />

December 31, 1995 and has not been re-enacted. Federal legislation appears to be at a standstill. At this<br />

time, it is not possible to predict the direction that any reforms may take, when they may occur or the<br />

eÅect that any changes may have on the insurance industry.<br />

Without federal movement on Superfund reform, the enforcement <strong>of</strong> Superfund liability is<br />

shifting to the states. States are being forced to reconsider state-level cleanup statutes and regulations.<br />

As individual states move forward, the potential for conÖicting state regulation becomes greater. In a<br />

few states, we are seeing cases brought against insureds or directly against insurance companies for<br />

environmental pollution and natural resources damages. To date, only a few natural resource claims<br />

have been Ñled and they are being vigorously defended. SigniÑcant uncertainty remains as to the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> remediating the state sites. Because <strong>of</strong> the large number <strong>of</strong> state sites, such sites could prove even<br />

more costly in the aggregate than Superfund sites.<br />

In establishing our toxic waste reserves, we evaluate the exposure presented by each insured. As<br />

part <strong>of</strong> this evaluation, we consider a variety <strong>of</strong> factors including: the probable liability, available<br />

insurance coverage, judicial interpretations, past settlement values <strong>of</strong> similar exposures as well as facts<br />

that are unique to each insured.<br />

Uncertainty remains as to our ultimate liability relating to toxic waste claims. However, toxic<br />

waste losses appear to be developing as expected due to relatively stable claim trends. In many cases,<br />

claims are being settled for less than initially anticipated due to more eÇcient site remediation eÅorts.<br />

In other cases, we have been successful at buying back our policies.<br />

The following table presents a reconciliation <strong>of</strong> our beginning and ending loss reserves, net <strong>of</strong><br />

reinsurance recoverable, related to toxic waste claims. There are virtually no reinsurance recoveries<br />

related to these claims.<br />

Years Ended December 31<br />

<strong>2005</strong> 2004 2003<br />

(in millions)<br />

Reserves, beginning <strong>of</strong> yearÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ $208 $226 $249<br />

Incurred losses ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ Ì Ì Ì<br />

Losses paid ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ 17 18 23<br />

Reserves, end <strong>of</strong> year ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ $191 $208 $226<br />

Of the net toxic waste loss reserves at December 31, <strong>2005</strong> $64 million was for IBNR losses.<br />

Reinsurance Recoverable. Reinsurance recoverable is the estimated amount recoverable from<br />

reinsurers related to the losses we have incurred. At December 31, <strong>2005</strong>, reinsurance recoverable<br />

included $396 million recoverable with respect to paid losses and loss expenses, which is included in<br />

other assets, and $3.8 billion recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses.<br />

Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses represents an estimate <strong>of</strong> the portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> our gross loss reserves that will be recovered from reinsurers. Such reinsurance recoverable is<br />

estimated as part <strong>of</strong> our loss reserving process using assumptions that are consistent with the<br />

assumptions used in estimating the gross loss reserves. Consequently, the estimation <strong>of</strong> reinsurance<br />

recoverable is subject to similar judgments and uncertainties as the estimation <strong>of</strong> gross loss reserves.<br />

Ceded reinsurance contracts do not relieve our primary obligation to our policyholders. Consequently,<br />

an exposure exists with respect to reinsurance recoverable to the extent that any reinsurer is<br />

unable or unwilling to meet the obligations assumed under the reinsurance contracts. We are selective<br />

in regard to our reinsurers, placing reinsurance with only those reinsurers with strong<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!