28.01.2015 Views

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

* Deuteronomy, 34. 9<br />

-<br />

In the like sense it is said, "If any man have not the Spirit of<br />

Christ, he is none of his":* not meaning thereby the ghost of<br />

Christ, but a submission to his doctrine. As also, "Hereby you shall<br />

know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ<br />

is come in the flesh is of God";*(2) by which is meant the spirit of<br />

unfeigned Christianity, submission to that main article of Christian<br />

faith, that Jesus is the Christ; which cannot be interpreted of a<br />

ghost.<br />

-<br />

* Romans, 8. 9<br />

*(2) I John, 4. 2<br />

-<br />

Likewise these words, "And Jesus full of the Holy Ghost"* (that<br />

is, as it is expressed, Matthew, 4. 1, and Mark, 1. 12, "of the Holy<br />

Spirit") may be understood for zeal to do the work for which he was<br />

sent by God the Father: but to interpret it of a ghost is to say<br />

that God Himself (for so our Saviour was) was filled with God; which<br />

is very improper and insignificant. How we came to translate spirits<br />

by the word ghosts, which signifieth nothing, neither in heaven nor<br />

earth, but the imaginary inhabitants of man's brain, I examine not:<br />

but this I say, the word spirit in the text signifieth no such<br />

thing; but either properly a real substance or, metaphorically, some<br />

extraordinary ability or affection of the mind or of the body.<br />

-<br />

* Luke, 4. 1<br />

-<br />

The Disciples of Christ, seeing him walking upon the sea* supposed<br />

him to be a spirit, meaning thereby an aerial body, and not a<br />

phantasm: for it is said they all saw him; which cannot be<br />

understood of the delusions of the brain (which are not common to many<br />

at once. as visible bodies are; but singular, because of the<br />

differences of fancies), but of bodies only. In like manner, where<br />

he was taken for a spirit, by the same Apostles:*(2) so also when<br />

St. Peter was delivered out of prison, it would not be believed; but<br />

when the maid said he was at the door, they said it was his angel;*(3)<br />

by which must be meant a corporeal substance, or we must say the<br />

disciples themselves did follow the common opinion of both Jews and<br />

Gentiles that some such apparitions were not imaginary, but real;<br />

and such as needed not the fancy of man for their existence: these the<br />

Jews called spirits and angels, good or bad; as the Greeks called<br />

the same by the name of demons. And some such apparitions may be<br />

real and substantial; that is to say, subtle bodies, which God can<br />

form by the same power by which He formed all things, and make use<br />

of as ministers and messengers (that is to say, angels), to declare<br />

His will, and execute the same when He pleaseth in extraordinary and<br />

supernatural manner. But when He hath so formed them they are<br />

substances, endued with dimensions, and take up room, and can be moved<br />

from place to place, which is peculiar to bodies; and therefore are<br />

not ghosts not ghosts incorporeal, that is to say, ghosts that are<br />

in no place; that is to say, that are nowhere; that is to say, that,<br />

seeming to be somewhat, are nothing. But if corporeal be taken in<br />

the most vulgar manner, for such substances as are perceptible by<br />

our external senses; then is substance incorporeal a thing not<br />

imaginary, but real; namely, a thin substance invisible, but that hath<br />

the same dimensions that are in grosser bodies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!