Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
-<br />
* Matthew, 14. 26 and Mark, 6. 49<br />
*(2) Luke, 24. 3, 7<br />
*(3) Acts, 12. 15<br />
-<br />
By the name of angel is signified, generally, a messenger; and<br />
most often, a messenger of God: and by a messenger of God is signified<br />
anything that makes known His extraordinary presence; that is to<br />
say, the extraordinary manifestation of His power, especially by a<br />
dream or vision.<br />
Concerning the creation of angels, there is nothing delivered in the<br />
Scriptures. That they are spirits is often repeated: but by the name<br />
of spirit is signified both in Scripture and vulgarly, both amongst<br />
Jews and Gentiles, sometimes thin bodies; as the air, the wind, the<br />
spirits vital and animal of living creatures; and sometimes the images<br />
that rise in the fancy in dreams and visions; which are not real<br />
substances, nor last any longer than the dream or vision they appear<br />
in; which apparitions, though no real substances, but accidents of the<br />
brain; yet when God raiseth them supernaturally, to signify His<br />
will, they are not improperly termed God's messengers, that is to say,<br />
His angels.<br />
And as the Gentiles did vulgarly conceive the imagery of the brain<br />
for things really subsistent without them, and not dependent on the<br />
fancy; and out of them framed their opinions of demons, good and evil;<br />
which because they seemed to subsist really, they called substances;<br />
and because they could not feel them with their hands, incorporeal: so<br />
also the Jews upon the same ground, without anything in the Old<br />
Testament that constrained them thereunto, had generally an opinion<br />
(except the sect of the Sadducees) that those apparitions, which it<br />
pleased God sometimes to produce in the fancy of men, for His own<br />
service, and therefore called them His angels, were substances, not<br />
dependent on the fancy, but permanent creatures of God; whereof<br />
those which they thought were good to them, they esteemed the angels<br />
of God, and those they thought would hurt them, they called evil<br />
angels, or evil spirits; such as was the spirit of Python, and the<br />
spirits of madmen, of lunatics and epileptics: for they esteemed<br />
such as were troubled with such diseases, demoniacs.<br />
But if we consider the places of the Old Testament where angels<br />
are mentioned, we shall find that in most of them, there can nothing<br />
else be understood by the word angel, but some image raised,<br />
supernaturally, in the fancy, to signify the presence of God in the<br />
execution of some supernatural work; and therefore in the rest,<br />
where their nature is not expressed, it may be understood in the<br />
same manner.<br />
For we read that the same apparition is called not only an angel,<br />
but God, where that which is called the angel of the Lord, saith to<br />
Hagar, "I will multiply thy seed exceedingly";* that is, speaketh in<br />
the person of God. Neither was this apparition a fancy figured, but<br />
a voice. By which it is manifest that angel signifieth there nothing<br />
but God Himself, that caused Hagar supernaturally to apprehend a voice<br />
from heaven; or rather, nothing else but a voice supernatural,<br />
testifying God's special presence there. Why therefore may not the<br />
angels that appeared to Lot, and are called men;*(2) and to whom,<br />
though they were two, Lot speaketh as but to one,*(3) and that one<br />
as God (for the words are, "Lot said unto them, Oh not so my Lord"),<br />
be understood of images of men, supernaturally formed in the fancy; as<br />
well as before by angel was understood a fancied voice When the angel