Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
express promise, because he is one whose power perhaps is not<br />
considerable; yet if he live under their protection openly, he is<br />
understood to submit himself to the government: but if he live there<br />
secretly, he is liable to anything that may be done to a spy and enemy<br />
of the state. I say not, he does any injustice (for acts of open<br />
hostility bear not that name); but that he may be justly put to death.<br />
Likewise, if a man, when his country is conquered, be out of it, he is<br />
not conquered, nor subject: but if at his return he submit to the<br />
government, he is bound to obey it. So that conquest, to define it, is<br />
the acquiring of the right of sovereignty by victory. Which right is<br />
acquired in the people's submission, by which they contract with the<br />
victor, promising obedience, for life and liberty.<br />
In the twenty-ninth Chapter I have set down for one of the causes of<br />
the dissolutions of Commonwealths their imperfect generation,<br />
consisting in the want of an absolute and arbitrary legislative power;<br />
for want whereof, the civil sovereign is fain to handle the sword of<br />
justice unconstantly, and as if it were too hot for him to hold: one<br />
reason whereof (which I have not there mentioned) is this, that they<br />
will all of them justify the war by which their power was at first<br />
gotten, and whereon, as they think, their right dependeth, and not<br />
on the possession. As if, for example, the right of the kings of<br />
England did depend on the goodness of the cause of William the<br />
Conqueror, and upon their lineal and directest descent from him; by<br />
which means, there would perhaps be no tie of the subjects'<br />
obedience to their sovereign at this day in all the world: wherein<br />
whilst they needlessly think to justify themselves, they justify all<br />
the successful rebellions that ambition shall at any time raise<br />
against them and their successors. Therefore I put down for one of the<br />
most effectual seeds of the death of any state, that the conquerors<br />
require not only a submission of men's actions to them for the future,<br />
but also an approbation of all their actions past; when there is<br />
scarce a Commonwealth in the world whose beginnings can in<br />
conscience be justified.<br />
And because the name of tyranny signifieth nothing more nor less<br />
than the name of sovereignty, be it in one or many men, saving that<br />
they that use the former word are understood to be angry with them<br />
they call tyrants; I think the toleration of a professed hatred of<br />
tyranny is a toleration of hatred to Commonwealth in general, and<br />
another evil seed, not differing much from the former. For to the<br />
justification of the cause of a conqueror, the reproach of the cause<br />
of the conquered is for the most part necessary: but neither of them<br />
necessary for the obligation of the conquered. And thus much I have<br />
thought fit to say upon the review of the first and second part of<br />
this discourse.<br />
In the thirty-fifth Chapter, I have sufficiently declared out of the<br />
Scripture that in the Commonwealth of the Jews, God Himself was made<br />
the Sovereign, by pact with the people; who were therefore called<br />
His "peculiar people," to distinguish them from the rest of the world,<br />
over whom God reigned, not by their consent, but by His own power: and<br />
that in this kingdom Moses was God's lieutenant on earth; and that<br />
it was he that told them what laws God appointed them to be ruled<br />
by. But I have omitted to set down who were the officers appointed<br />
to do execution; especially in capital punishments; not then<br />
thinking it a matter of so necessary consideration as I find it since.<br />
We know that generally in all Commonwealths, the execution of<br />
corporeal punishments was either put upon the guards, or other<br />
soldiers of the sovereign power, or given to those in whom want of