28.01.2015 Views

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

unless he had pleased. And as in the time of the Apostles, so also all<br />

the time downward, till after Constantine the Great, we shall find<br />

that the maintenance of the bishops and pastors of the Christian<br />

Church was nothing but the voluntary contribution of them that had<br />

embraced their doctrine. There was yet no mention of tithes: but<br />

such was in the time of Constantine and his sons the affection of<br />

Christians to their pastors, as Ammianus Marcellinus saith, describing<br />

the sedition of Damasus and Ursinus about the bishopric, that it was<br />

worth their contention, in that the bishops of those times by the<br />

liberality of their flock, and especially of matrons, lived<br />

splendidly, were carried in coaches, and were sumptuous in their<br />

fare and apparel.<br />

-<br />

* Acts, 4. 34, 35<br />

*(2) Ibid., 5. 4<br />

-<br />

But here may some ask whether the pastor were then bound to live<br />

upon voluntary contribution, as upon alms, "For who," saith St.<br />

Paul, "goeth to war at his own charges or who feedeth a flock, and<br />

eateth not of the milk of the flock"* And again, "Do ye not know that<br />

they which minister about holy things live of the things of the<br />

Temple; and they which wait at the altar partake with the<br />

altar";*(2) that is to say, have part of that which is offered at<br />

the altar for their maintenance And then he concludeth, "Even so hath<br />

the Lord appointed that they which preach the gospel should live of<br />

the gospel." From which place may be inferred, indeed, that the<br />

pastors of the Church ought to be maintained by their flocks; but<br />

not that the pastors were to determine either the quantity or the kind<br />

of their own allowance, and be, as it were, their own carvers. Their<br />

allowance must needs therefore be determined either by the gratitude<br />

and liberality of every particular man of their flock or by the<br />

whole congregation. By the whole congregation it could not be, because<br />

their acts were then no laws: therefore the maintenance of pastors<br />

before emperors and civil sovereigns had made laws to settle it was<br />

nothing but benevolence. They that served at the altar lived on what<br />

was offered. So may the pastors also take what is offered them by<br />

their flock, but not exact what is not offered. In what court should<br />

they sue for it who had no tribunals Or if they had arbitrators<br />

amongst themselves, who should execute their judgements when they<br />

had no power to arm their officers It remaineth therefore that<br />

there could be no certain maintenance assigned to any pastors of the<br />

Church, but by the whole congregation; and then only when their<br />

decrees should have the force, not only of canons, but also of laws;<br />

which laws could not be made but by emperors, kings, or other civil<br />

sovereigns. The right of tithes in Moses' Law could not be applied<br />

to then ministers of the Gospel, because Moses and the high priests<br />

were the civil sovereigns of the people under God, whose kingdom<br />

amongst the Jews was present; whereas the kingdom of God by Christ<br />

is yet to come.<br />

-<br />

* I Corinthians, 9. 7<br />

*(2) Ibid., 9. 13<br />

-<br />

Hitherto hath been shown what the pastors of the Church are; what<br />

are the points of their commission, as that they were to preach, to<br />

teach, to baptize, to be presidents in their several congregations;<br />

what is ecclesiastical censure, viz., excommunication, that is to say,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!