28.01.2015 Views

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to preach.*(6) The use then of this ceremony considered in the<br />

ordination of pastors was to design the person to whom they gave<br />

such power. But if there had been then any Christian that had had<br />

the power of teaching before, the baptizing of him, that is, the<br />

making him a Christian, had given him no new power, but had only<br />

caused him to preach true doctrine, that is, to use his power<br />

aright; and therefore the imposition of hands had been unnecessary;<br />

baptism itself had been sufficient. But every sovereign, before<br />

Christianity, had the power of teaching and ordaining teachers; and<br />

therefore Christianity gave them no new right, but only directed<br />

them in the way of teaching truth; and consequently they needed no<br />

imposition of hands (besides that which is done in baptism) to<br />

authorize them to exercise any part of the pastoral function, as<br />

namely, to baptize and consecrate. And in the Old Testament, though<br />

the priest only had right to consecrate, during the time that the<br />

sovereignty was in the high priest, yet it was not so when the<br />

sovereignty was in the king: for we read that Solomon blessed the<br />

people, consecrated the Temple, and pronounced that public prayer,*(7)<br />

which is the pattern now for consecration of all Christian churches<br />

and chapels: whereby it appears he had not only the right of<br />

ecclesiastical government, but also of exercising ecclesiastical<br />

functions.<br />

-<br />

* Acts, 6. 6<br />

*(2) Ibid., 6. 3<br />

*(3) Ibid., 8. 17<br />

*(4) I Timothy, 5. 22<br />

*(5) Acts, 9. 17, 18<br />

*(6) Ibid., 13. 3<br />

*(7) I Kings, 8<br />

-<br />

From this consolidation of the right politic and ecclesiastic in<br />

Christian sovereigns, it is evident they have all manner of power over<br />

their subjects that can be given to man for the government of men's<br />

external actions, both in policy and religion, and may make such<br />

laws as themselves shall judge fittest, for the government of their<br />

own subjects, both as they are the Commonwealth and as they are the<br />

Church: for both State and Church are the same men.<br />

If they please, therefore, they may, as many Christian kings now do,<br />

commit the government of their subjects in matters of religion to<br />

the Pope; but then the Pope is in that point subordinate to them,<br />

and exerciseth that charge in another's dominion jure civili, in the<br />

right of the civil sovereign; not jure divino, in God's right; and may<br />

therefore be discharged of that office when the sovereign for the good<br />

of his subjects shall think it necessary. They may also, if they<br />

please, commit the care of religion to one supreme pastor, or to an<br />

assembly of pastors, and give them what power over the Church, or<br />

one over another, they think most convenient; and what titles of<br />

honor, as of bishops, archbishops, priests, or presbyters, they<br />

will; and make such laws for their maintenance, either by tithes or<br />

otherwise, as they please, so they do it out of a sincere<br />

conscience, of which God only is the judge. It is the civil<br />

sovereign that is to appoint judges and interpreters of the<br />

canonical scriptures; for it is he that maketh them laws. It is he<br />

also that giveth strength to excommunications; which but for such laws<br />

and punishments as may humble obstinate libertines, and reduce them to<br />

union with the rest of the Church, would be contemned. In sum, he hath

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!