Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
to preach.*(6) The use then of this ceremony considered in the<br />
ordination of pastors was to design the person to whom they gave<br />
such power. But if there had been then any Christian that had had<br />
the power of teaching before, the baptizing of him, that is, the<br />
making him a Christian, had given him no new power, but had only<br />
caused him to preach true doctrine, that is, to use his power<br />
aright; and therefore the imposition of hands had been unnecessary;<br />
baptism itself had been sufficient. But every sovereign, before<br />
Christianity, had the power of teaching and ordaining teachers; and<br />
therefore Christianity gave them no new right, but only directed<br />
them in the way of teaching truth; and consequently they needed no<br />
imposition of hands (besides that which is done in baptism) to<br />
authorize them to exercise any part of the pastoral function, as<br />
namely, to baptize and consecrate. And in the Old Testament, though<br />
the priest only had right to consecrate, during the time that the<br />
sovereignty was in the high priest, yet it was not so when the<br />
sovereignty was in the king: for we read that Solomon blessed the<br />
people, consecrated the Temple, and pronounced that public prayer,*(7)<br />
which is the pattern now for consecration of all Christian churches<br />
and chapels: whereby it appears he had not only the right of<br />
ecclesiastical government, but also of exercising ecclesiastical<br />
functions.<br />
-<br />
* Acts, 6. 6<br />
*(2) Ibid., 6. 3<br />
*(3) Ibid., 8. 17<br />
*(4) I Timothy, 5. 22<br />
*(5) Acts, 9. 17, 18<br />
*(6) Ibid., 13. 3<br />
*(7) I Kings, 8<br />
-<br />
From this consolidation of the right politic and ecclesiastic in<br />
Christian sovereigns, it is evident they have all manner of power over<br />
their subjects that can be given to man for the government of men's<br />
external actions, both in policy and religion, and may make such<br />
laws as themselves shall judge fittest, for the government of their<br />
own subjects, both as they are the Commonwealth and as they are the<br />
Church: for both State and Church are the same men.<br />
If they please, therefore, they may, as many Christian kings now do,<br />
commit the government of their subjects in matters of religion to<br />
the Pope; but then the Pope is in that point subordinate to them,<br />
and exerciseth that charge in another's dominion jure civili, in the<br />
right of the civil sovereign; not jure divino, in God's right; and may<br />
therefore be discharged of that office when the sovereign for the good<br />
of his subjects shall think it necessary. They may also, if they<br />
please, commit the care of religion to one supreme pastor, or to an<br />
assembly of pastors, and give them what power over the Church, or<br />
one over another, they think most convenient; and what titles of<br />
honor, as of bishops, archbishops, priests, or presbyters, they<br />
will; and make such laws for their maintenance, either by tithes or<br />
otherwise, as they please, so they do it out of a sincere<br />
conscience, of which God only is the judge. It is the civil<br />
sovereign that is to appoint judges and interpreters of the<br />
canonical scriptures; for it is he that maketh them laws. It is he<br />
also that giveth strength to excommunications; which but for such laws<br />
and punishments as may humble obstinate libertines, and reduce them to<br />
union with the rest of the Church, would be contemned. In sum, he hath