Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
annexed. And thus much in refutation of his first book, wherein he<br />
would prove St. Peter to have been the monarch universal of the<br />
Church, that is to say, of all the Christians in the world.<br />
-<br />
* Matthew, 18. 18<br />
-<br />
The second book hath two conclusions: one, that St. Peter was Bishop<br />
of Rome, and there died; the other, that the Popes of Rome are his<br />
successors; both which have been disputed by others. But supposing<br />
them true; yet if by Bishop of Rome be understood either the monarch<br />
of the Church, or the supreme pastor of it, not Silvester, but<br />
Constantine (who was the first Christian emperor) was that bishop; and<br />
as Constantine, so all other Christian emperors were of right<br />
supreme bishops of the Roman Empire. I say, of the Roman Empire, not<br />
of all Christendom, for other Christian sovereigns had the same<br />
right in their several territories, as to an office essentially<br />
adherent to their sovereignty: which shall serve for answer to his<br />
second book.<br />
In the third book he handleth the question whether the Pope be<br />
Antichrist. For my part, I see no argument that proves he is so, in<br />
that sense the Scripture useth the name: nor will I take any<br />
argument from the quality of Antichrist to contradict the authority he<br />
exerciseth, or hath heretofore exercised, in the dominions of any<br />
other prince or state.<br />
It is evident that the prophets of the Old Testament foretold, and<br />
the Jews expected, a Messiah, that is, a Christ, that should<br />
re-establish amongst them the kingdom of God, which had been<br />
rejected by them in the time of Samuel when they required a king after<br />
the manner of other nations. This expectation of theirs made them<br />
obnoxious to the imposture of all such as had both the ambition to<br />
attempt the attaining of the kingdom, and the art to deceive the<br />
people by counterfeit miracles, by hypocritical life, or by orations<br />
and doctrine plausible. Our Saviour therefore, and his Apostles,<br />
forewarned men of false prophets and of false Christs. False Christs<br />
are such as pretend to be the Christ, but are not, and are called<br />
properly Antichrists, in such sense as when there happeneth a schism<br />
in the Church by the election of two Popes, the one the one calleth<br />
the other Antipapa, or the false Pope. And therefore Antichrist in the<br />
proper signification hath two essential marks: one, that he denieth<br />
Jesus to be Christ; and another that he professeth himself to be<br />
Christ. The first mark is set down by St. John in his first Epistle,<br />
4. 3, "Every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in<br />
the flesh is not of God; and this is the spirit of Antichrist." The<br />
other mark is expressed in the words of our Saviour, "Many shall<br />
come in my name, saying, I am Christ";* and again, "If any man shall<br />
say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, there is Christ, believe it not."<br />
And therefore Antichrist must be a false Christ; that is, some one<br />
of them that shall pretend themselves to be Christ. And out of these<br />
two marks, to deny Jesus to be the Christ and to affirm himself to<br />
be the Christ, it followeth that he must also be an adversary of Jesus<br />
the true Christ, which is another usual signification of the word<br />
Antichrist. But of these many Antichrists, there is one special one, o<br />
Antichristos, the Antichrist, or Antichrist definitely, as one certain<br />
person; not indefinitely an Antichrist. Now seeing the Pope of Rome<br />
neither pretendeth himself, nor denieth Jesus to be the Christ, I<br />
perceive not how he can be called Antichrist; by which word is not<br />
meant one that falsely pretendeth to be his lieutenant, or vicar