28.01.2015 Views

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

three different times and occasions. To conclude, the doctrine of<br />

the Trinity, as far as can be gathered directly from the Scripture, is<br />

in substance this: that God, who is always one and the same, was the<br />

person represented by Moses; the person represented by his Son<br />

incarnate; and the person represented by the Apostles. As<br />

represented by the Apostles, the Holy Spirit by which they spoke is<br />

God; as represented by His Son, that was God and man, the Son is<br />

that God; as represented by Moses and the high priests, the Father,<br />

that is to say, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, is that God: from<br />

whence we may gather the reason those names Father, Son, and Holy<br />

Spirit, in the signification of the godhead, are never used in the Old<br />

Testament: for they are persons, that is, they have their names from<br />

representing; which could not be till diverse men had represented<br />

God's person in ruling or in directing under Him.<br />

-<br />

* Luke, 5. 11<br />

*(2) Acts, 1. 21, 22<br />

*(3) Ibid., 1. 8<br />

*(4) Ibid., 1. 10<br />

-<br />

Thus we see how the power ecclesiastical was left by our Saviour<br />

to the Apostles; and how they were (to the end they might the better<br />

exercise that power) endued with the Holy Spirit, which is therefore<br />

called sometimes in the New Testament paracletus, which signifieth<br />

an assister, or one called to for help, though it be commonly<br />

translated a comforter. Let us now consider the power itself, what<br />

it was, and over whom.<br />

Cardinal Bellarmine, in his third general controversy, hath<br />

handled a great many questions concerning the ecclesiastical power<br />

of the Pope of Rome, and begins with this, whether it ought to be<br />

monarchical, aristocratical, or democratical. All which sorts of power<br />

are sovereign and coercive. If now it should appear that there is no<br />

coercive power left them by our Saviour, but only a power to<br />

proclaim the kingdom of Christ, and to persuade men to submit<br />

themselves there unto; and, by precepts and good counsel, to teach<br />

them that have submitted what they are to do, that they may be<br />

received into the kingdom of God when it comes; and that the Apostles,<br />

and other ministers of the Gospel, are our schoolmasters, and not<br />

our commanders, and their precepts not laws, but wholesome counsels;<br />

then were all that dispute in vain.<br />

I have shown already, in the last chapter, that the kingdom of<br />

Christ is not of this world: therefore neither can his ministers,<br />

unless they be kings, require obedience in his name. For if the<br />

Supreme King have not his regal power in this world; by what authority<br />

can obedience be required to his officers "As my Father sent me,"<br />

so saith our Saviour, "I send you."* But our Saviour was sent to<br />

persuade the Jews to return to, and to invite the Gentiles to receive,<br />

the kingdom of his Father, and not to reign in majesty, no not as<br />

his Father's lieutenant till the day of judgement.<br />

-<br />

* John, 20. 21<br />

-<br />

The time between the ascension and the general resurrection is<br />

called, not a reigning, but a regeneration; that is, a preparation<br />

of men for the second and glorious coming of Christ at the day of<br />

judgement, as appeareth by the words of our Saviour, "You that have<br />

followed me in the regeneration, when the Son of man shall sit in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!